Literature DB >> 16868862

New tricks for old drugs: the anticarcinogenic potential of DNA repair inhibitors.

Melissa S Bentle1, Erik A Bey, Ying Dong, Kathryn E Reinicke, David A Boothman.   

Abstract

Defective or abortive repair of DNA lesions has been associated with carcinogenesis. Therefore it is imperative for a cell to accurately repair its DNA after damage if it is to return to a normal cellular phenotype. In certain circumstances, if DNA damage cannot be repaired completely and with high fidelity, it is more advantageous for an organism to have some of its more severely damaged cells die rather than survive as neoplastic transformants. A number of DNA repair inhibitors have the potential to act as anticarcinogenic compounds. These drugs are capable of modulating DNA repair, thus promoting cell death rather than repair of potentially carcinogenic DNA damage mediated by error-prone DNA repair processes. In theory, exposure to a DNA repair inhibitor during, or immediately after, carcinogenic exposure should decrease or prevent tumorigenesis. However, the ability of DNA repair inhibitors to prevent cancer development is difficult to interpret depending upon the system used and the type of genotoxic stress. Inhibitors may act on multiple aspects of DNA repair as well as the cellular signaling pathways activated in response to the initial damage. In this review, we summarize basic DNA repair mechanisms and explore the effects of a number of DNA repair inhibitors that not only potentiate DNA-damaging agents but also decrease carcinogenicity. In particular, we focus on a novel anti-tumor agent, beta-lapachone, and its potential to block transformation by modulating poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16868862     DOI: 10.1007/s10735-006-9043-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Histol        ISSN: 1567-2379            Impact factor:   3.156


  134 in total

Review 1.  Partners and pathwaysrepairing a double-strand break.

Authors:  J E Haber
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.

Authors:  Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effect of combined DNA repair inhibition and G2 checkpoint inhibition on cell cycle progression after DNA damage.

Authors:  Christopher M Sturgeon; Zachary A Knight; Kevan M Shokat; Michel Roberge
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  [Inhibitory effect of caffeine on the induction of cutaneous cancers by ultraviolet rays in the mouse].

Authors:  F Zajdela; R Latarjet
Journal:  C R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D       Date:  1973-09-24

5.  Hypoxia induces c-fos transcription via a mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent pathway.

Authors:  J M Müller; B Krauss; C Kaltschmidt; P A Baeuerle; R A Rupec
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-09-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) in homologous recombination and as a target for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Helleday; Helen E Bryant; Niklas Schultz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  DNA double strand break repair in mammalian cells.

Authors:  P Karran
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Irreversible binding of poly(ADP)ribose polymerase cleavage product to DNA ends revealed by atomic force microscopy: possible role in apoptosis.

Authors:  M E Smulson; D Pang; M Jung; A Dimtchev; S Chasovskikh; A Spoonde; C Simbulan-Rosenthal; D Rosenthal; A Yakovlev; A Dritschilo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  The effect of caffeine on diethylnitrosamine-initiated hepatic altered foci in a mid-term induction system.

Authors:  S H Kim; C S Lee
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 10.  NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1, DT-diaphorase), functions and pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  David Ross; David Siegel
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.600

View more
  17 in total

1.  Expression profile of DNA damage signaling genes in 2 Gy proton exposed mouse brain.

Authors:  Sudhakar Baluchamy; Ye Zhang; Prabakaran Ravichandran; Vani Ramesh; Ayodotun Sodipe; Joseph C Hall; Olufisayo Jejelowo; Daila S Gridley; Honglu Wu; Govindarajan T Ramesh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  DNA repair inhibitors in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Isabel Sánchez-Pérez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  DNA damage-induced cell death: lessons from the central nervous system.

Authors:  Helena Lobo Borges; Rafael Linden; Jean Y J Wang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  Structural simplification of bioactive natural products with multicomponent synthesis. 4. 4H-pyrano-[2,3-b]naphthoquinones with anticancer activity.

Authors:  Igor V Magedov; Artem S Kireev; Aaron R Jenkins; Nikolai M Evdokimov; Dustin T Lima; Paul Tongwa; Jeff Altig; Wim F A Steelant; Severine Van slambrouck; Mikhail Yu Antipin; Alexander Kornienko
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Differential oxidative stress gene expression profile in mouse brain after proton exposure.

Authors:  Sudhakar Baluchamy; Ye Zhang; Prabakaran Ravichandran; Vani Ramesh; Ayodotun Sodipe; Joseph C Hall; Olufisayo Jejelowo; Daila S Gridley; Honglu Wu; Govindarajan T Ramesh
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.416

6.  The effects of resveratrol and selected metabolites on the radiation and antioxidant response.

Authors:  Kristin M Fabre; Keita Saito; William DeGraff; Anastasia L Sowers; Angela Thetford; John A Cook; Murali C Krishna; James B Mitchell
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.742

7.  Using a novel NQO1 bioactivatable drug, beta-lapachone (ARQ761), to enhance chemotherapeutic effects by metabolic modulation in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Shaalan Beg; Xiumei Huang; Molly A Silvers; David E Gerber; Joyce Bolluyt; Venetia Sarode; Farjana Fattah; Ralph J Deberardinis; Matthew E Merritt; Xian-Jin Xie; Richard Leff; Daniel Laheru; David A Boothman
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.885

8.  The small GTPase RhoA localizes to the nucleus and is activated by Net1 and DNA damage signals.

Authors:  Adi D Dubash; Christophe Guilluy; Melissa C Srougi; Etienne Boulter; Keith Burridge; Rafael García-Mata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Catalase abrogates β-lapachone-induced PARP1 hyperactivation-directed programmed necrosis in NQO1-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Erik A Bey; Kathryn E Reinicke; Melissa C Srougi; Marie Varnes; Vernon E Anderson; John J Pink; Long Shan Li; Malina Patel; Lifen Cao; Zachary Moore; Amy Rommel; Michael Boatman; Cheryl Lewis; David M Euhus; William G Bornmann; Donald J Buchsbaum; Douglas R Spitz; Jinming Gao; David A Boothman
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.009

10.  An NQO1- and PARP-1-mediated cell death pathway induced in non-small-cell lung cancer cells by beta-lapachone.

Authors:  Erik A Bey; Melissa S Bentle; Kathryn E Reinicke; Ying Dong; Chin-Rang Yang; Luc Girard; John D Minna; William G Bornmann; Jinming Gao; David A Boothman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 12.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.