L Rejnmark1, P Vestergaard, L Mosekilde. 1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus Sygehus, Tage Hansens Gade 2, Aarhus C, DK-8000 Denmark. rejnmark@post6.tele.dk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Discrepant results have been reported on association between treatment with lipid lowering drugs and fracture risk. Several studies have failed to demonstrate an effect of statins on bone mineral density. Therefore, the epidemiological findings of a reduced fracture risk may be due to selections bias, e.g. a healthy drug user effect. If so, the reduced fracture risk is most likely independent of type of lipid lowering drug. AIM: We assessed fracture risk in users of various lipid-lowering drugs. METHODS: In a case-control design, we compared 124,655 fracture cases with 373,962 age- and gender-matched controls. We used computerized registers to assess individual drug use and related these data to individual fracture data and information on potential confounders. RESULTS: Use of statins was associated with a reduced risk of any fracture (adj. OR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and hip fractures (adj. OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.69). Risk of hip fracture decreased with increased accumulated dose of statins. This was true in men and in women and in subjects younger and older than 65 years of age. However, fracture risk was not reduced in patients treated with pravastatin (adj. OR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.17) or non-statin lipid lowering drugs (adj. OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: The reduced fracture risk in users of lipid lowering drugs is apparently specifically related to users of non-pravastatin statins. Our findings do not support the hypothesis of a healthy drug user effect as an explanation for the reduced fracture risk in users of statins.
INTRODUCTION: Discrepant results have been reported on association between treatment with lipid lowering drugs and fracture risk. Several studies have failed to demonstrate an effect of statins on bone mineral density. Therefore, the epidemiological findings of a reduced fracture risk may be due to selections bias, e.g. a healthy drug user effect. If so, the reduced fracture risk is most likely independent of type of lipid lowering drug. AIM: We assessed fracture risk in users of various lipid-lowering drugs. METHODS: In a case-control design, we compared 124,655 fracture cases with 373,962 age- and gender-matched controls. We used computerized registers to assess individual drug use and related these data to individual fracture data and information on potential confounders. RESULTS: Use of statins was associated with a reduced risk of any fracture (adj. OR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and hip fractures (adj. OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.69). Risk of hip fracture decreased with increased accumulated dose of statins. This was true in men and in women and in subjects younger and older than 65 years of age. However, fracture risk was not reduced in patients treated with pravastatin (adj. OR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.17) or non-statin lipid lowering drugs (adj. OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: The reduced fracture risk in users of lipid lowering drugs is apparently specifically related to users of non-pravastatin statins. Our findings do not support the hypothesis of a healthy drug user effect as an explanation for the reduced fracture risk in users of statins.
Authors: L R Morse; N Nguyen; R A Battaglino; A J Guarino; D R Gagnon; R Zafonte; E Garshick Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Arja Helin-Salmivaara; Maarit J Korhonen; Petri Lehenkari; Seppo Y T Junnila; Pertti J Neuvonen; Päivi Ruokoniemi; Risto Huupponen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jan O Jansen; Janet M Lord; David R Thickett; Mark J Midwinter; Daniel F McAuley; Fang Gao Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 9.097