Literature DB >> 16868298

Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

Mario J Garcia1, Jonathan Lessick, Martin H K Hoffmann.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has been proposed as a noninvasive method to evaluate coronary anatomy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of 16-row MDCT for the detection of obstructive coronary disease based exclusively on quantitative analysis and performed in a multicenter study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Eleven participating sites prospectively enrolled 238 patients who were clinically referred for nonemergency coronary angiography from June 2004 through March 2005. Following a low-dose MDCT scan to evaluate coronary artery calcium, 187 patients with an Agatston score of less than 600 underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT. Conventional angiography was performed 1 to 14 days after MDCT. Conventional angiographic and MDCT studies were analyzed by independent core laboratories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Segment-based and patient-based sensitivities and specificities for the detection of luminal stenosis of more than 50% (of luminal diameter) and more than 70% (of luminal diameter) based on quantitative coronary angiography.
RESULTS: Of 1629 nonstented segments larger than 2 mm in diameter, there were 89 (5.5%) in 59 (32%) of 187 patients with stenosis of more than 50% by conventional angiography. Of the 1629 segments, 71% were evaluable on MDCT. After censoring all nonevaluable segments as positive, the sensitivity for detecting more than 50% luminal stenoses was 89%; specificity, 65%; positive predictive value, 13%; and negative predictive value, 99%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with at least 1 positive segment was 98%; specificity, 54%; positive predictive value, 50%; and negative predictive value, 99%. After censoring all nonevaluable segments as positive, the sensitivity for detecting more than 70% luminal stenoses was 94%; specificity, 67%; positive predictive value, 6%; and negative predictive value, 99%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with at least 1 positive segment was 94%; specificity, 51%; positive predictive value, 28%; and negative predictive value, 98%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that MDCT coronary angiography performed with 16-row scanners is limited by a high number of nonevaluable cases and a high false-positive rate. Thus, its routine implementation in clinical practice is not justified. Nevertheless, given its high sensitivity and negative predictive value, 16-row MDCT may be useful in excluding coronary disease in selected patients in whom a false-positive or inconclusive stress test result is suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16868298     DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.4.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  78 in total

1.  In vitro measurements of flow using multislice computed tomography (MSCT).

Authors:  Klaus Lackner; Henning Bovenschulte; Hartmut Stützer; Thomas Just; Hassan Al-Hassani; Barbara Krug
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  A practical guide to reading CT coronary angiograms--how to avoid mistakes when assessing for coronary stenoses.

Authors:  John W M Hoe; Kok Hong Toh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Accuracy and rate of coronary artery segment visualization with CT angiography for the non-invasive detection of coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Edith Bordeleau; Alexandre Lamonde; Julie Prenovault; Assia Belblidia; Gilles Coté; Jacques Lespérance; Gilles Soulez; Carl Chartrand-Lefebvre
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Non-invasive tests in coronary artery disease: are we facing a fork in the road?

Authors:  Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Role of cardiac computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: interaction with nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seiji Tomiguchi; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-12-25

7.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology review of the ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI).

Authors:  R Parker Ward; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Gabriel B Grossman; Christopher L Hansen; Robert C Hendel; Todd C Kerwin; Benjamin D McCallister; Rupa Mehta; Donna M Polk; Peter L Tilkemeier; Aseem Vashist; Kim Allan Williams; David G Wolinsky; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Anselmo Alessandro Palumbo; Roberto Malagò; Ludovico La Grutta; W Bob Meiijboom; Annachiara Aldrovandi; Michele Fusaro; Luigi Vignali; Alberto Menozzi; Valerio Brambilla; Paolo Coruzzi; Massimo Midiri; Miles A Kirchin; Nico R A Mollet; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64.

Authors:  Julie M Miller; Marc Dewey; Andrea L Vavere; Carlos E Rochitte; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Narinder Paul; John Hoe; Albert de Roos; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Pedro A Lemos; David E Bush; Albert C Lardo; John Texter; Jeffery Brinker; Christopher Cox; Melvin E Clouse; João A C Lima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: diagnostic accuracy in the real world.

Authors:  F Cademartiri; E Maffei; F Notarangelo; F Ugo; A Palumbo; D Lina; A Aldrovandi; E Solinas; C Reverberi; A Menozzi; L Vignali; R Malagò; M Midiri; N R Mollet; G Cervellin; D Ardissino
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.