Literature DB >> 16865595

A pathologic complete response of rectal cancer to preoperative combined-modality therapy results in improved oncological outcome compared with those who achieve no downstaging on the basis of preoperative endorectal ultrasonography.

Francesco Stipa1, David B Chessin, Jinru Shia, Philip B Paty, Martin Weiser, Larissa K F Temple, Bruce D Minsky, W Douglas Wong, Jose G Guillem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative combined-modality therapy (CMT) is the preferred treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (endorectal ultrasonography [ERUS] T3-4, N1, or clinically bulky) and achieves a pathologic complete response (pCR) in 4% to 33% of patients. However, the prognostic significance of pCR remains unclear.
METHODS: A prospectively collected database was queried to identify 200 patients with locally advanced disease treated from 1992 to 2002. The pCR group was defined as having no evidence of viable tumor on pathologic analysis. The no-downstaging group was defined as no difference between the pre-CMT ERUS stage and the pathologic stage. Those achieving some downstaging but not pCR were excluded. Patients were treated with CMT (5040 cGy of radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy) followed by surgery, and 51 (85%) in the pCR group and 129 (92%) in the no-downstaging group (P = .1) received postoperative chemotherapy. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 38.6 months (range, 18.2-124.9 months). The pCR (n = 60) and control (n = 140) groups were similar in age (P = .6), sex (P = .4), distance of the tumor from the anal verge (P = .3), pre-CMT ERUS stage (P = .2), and comorbidities (P = .2). The 5-year RFS was 96% and 54% in the pCR and control groups, respectively (P < .00001); the 5-year OS was 90% and 68% (P = .009). Sphincter-preservation rates were higher in the pCR group (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer patients with pCR after preoperative CMT have improved RFS, OS, and sphincter preservation compared with patients without downstaging. Because pCR seems to be associated with better outcome, an understanding of the factors governing the response to CMT should be pursued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16865595     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  45 in total

Review 1.  [Pathological staging and response evaluation of rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  C Wittekind; B Oberschmid
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Long-term results with oral fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable rectal cancer. A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Jorge Aparicio; Alejandro Tormo; Rafael Estevan; Josefina Artes; Alejandra Giménez; Ángel Segura; Susana Roldán; Rosana Palasí; David Ramos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Multidisciplinary management in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Asunción Hervás Morón; María Luisa García de Paredes; Eduardo Lobo Martínez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  [Response prediction--early response evaluation. Consequences for surgical oncology].

Authors:  J R Siewert; F Lordick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient for evaluating tumour response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seung Ho Kim; Jae Young Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Signet ring cell histology and non-circumferential tumors predict pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancers.

Authors:  Sunil Bhanu Jayanand; Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Ritesh Tapkire
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Local treatment for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Geisler
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

Review 8.  Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer after a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Jose M Enríquez-Navascués; Nerea Borda; Aintzane Lizerazu; Carlos Placer; Jose L Elosegui; Juan P Ciria; Adelaida Lacasta; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Smitha S Krishnamurthi; Yuji Seo; Timothy J Kinsella
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Role of three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography in the assessment of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Sthela M Murad-Regadas; Francisco Sergio P Regadas; Lusmar V Rodrigues; Rosilma G L Barreto; Francisco Coracy C Monteiro; Beethoven B Landim; Erico C Holanda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.