Literature DB >> 16865357

Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: should the process continue?

William M Strub1, Achala A Vagal, Thomas Tomsick, Jonathan S Moulton.   

Abstract

We report our experience with resident preliminary interpretations given at night on both abdominal and neurological CT scans to quantify the discrepancy rate when compared to the final report. An attempt was also made to document any adverse clinical outcomes as a result of the preliminary interpretation. From January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004, adult CT examinations were prospectively interpreted by residents at night at a level I trauma center. Both the neurological and body CT scans were reviewed beginning at 7:00 a.m. the following morning by the respective subspecialty staff and discrepancies were noted. Adult CT examinations (6,858) were prospectively interpreted by residents: 5,206 cranial spinal CT examinations and 1,652 body CT examinations. Among the neurological studies, there were six cases identified as major discrepancies (0.1%) and 185 minor discrepancies (3.5%). Among the body CT cases, there were seven cases identified as major discrepancies (0.4%) and 23 cases of minor discrepancies (1.4%). There is a low discrepancy rate (0.2% major and 3.1% minor) in the preliminary resident interpretations from the final report. The process of overnight preliminary CT interpretations should continue as it is not substandard care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16865357     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-006-0498-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  17 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  H D Sostman; D T Layish; V F Tapson; C E Spritzer; D M DeLong; P Trotter; J R MacFall; E F Patz; P C Goodman; P K Woodard; T K Foo; J L Farber
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Evaluation of emergency CT scans of the head: is there a community standard?

Authors:  William K Erly; Boyd C Ashdown; Richard W Lucio; Raymond F Carmody; Joachim F Seeger; Jennifer N Alcala
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference.

Authors:  D L Renfrew; E A Franken; K S Berbaum; F H Weigelt; M M Abu-Yousef
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists.

Authors:  M G Wysoki; C J Nassar; R A Koenigsberg; R A Novelline; S H Faro; E N Faerber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The value of consultation among radiologists.

Authors:  B J Hillman; R G Swensson; S J Hessel; D E Gerson; P G Herman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department.

Authors:  William K Erly; William G Berger; Elizabeth Krupinski; Joachim F Seeger; John A Guisto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Errors of interpretation as elicited by a quality audit of an emergency radiology facility.

Authors:  J T Rhea; M S Potsaid; S A DeLuca
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Reporting the "missed" radiologic diagnosis: medicolegal and ethical considerations.

Authors:  L Berlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Evaluation of an emergency radiology quality assurance program at a level I trauma center: abdominal and pelvic CT studies.

Authors:  Luke S Yoon; Andrew H Haims; James A Brink; Reuven Rabinovici; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.

Authors:  J A Harvey; L L Fajardo; C A Innis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  12 in total

1.  Emergency imaging discrepancy rates at a level 1 trauma center: identifying the most common on-call resident "misses".

Authors:  Jennifer Tomich; Michele Retrouvey; Sarah Shaves
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-07-26

2.  Trainee misinterpretations on pediatric neuroimaging studies: classification, imaging analysis, and outcome assessment.

Authors:  C V A Guimaraes; J L Leach; B V Jones
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  First year radiology residents not taking call: will there be a difference?

Authors:  William M Strub; James L Leach; Jun Ying; Achala Vagal
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-01-25

4.  The misinterpretation rates of radiology residents on emergent neuroradiology magnetic resonance (MR) angiogram studies: correlation with level of residency training.

Authors:  Christopher G Filippi; Russell E Meyer; Keith Cauley; Joshua P Nickerson; Heather N Burbank; Jason M Johnson; Grant J Linnell; Gray F Alsofrom
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-06-05

5.  The DePICTORS Study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff.

Authors:  Jessica Walls; Natalie Hunter; Penelope M A Brasher; Stephen G F Ho
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-01-29

6.  Review of outside studies by radiology residents: national survey of chief residents.

Authors:  David W Swenson; Anna Ellermeier; Elizabeth H Dibble; Jonathan S Movson; Thomas K Egglin; Martha B Mainiero
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29

7.  Transfer patient imaging: a survey of members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Robinson; Michael F McNeeley
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-04-24

8.  Development of an artificial intelligence-assisted computed tomography diagnosis technology for rib fracture and evaluation of its clinical usefulness.

Authors:  Akifumi Niiya; Kouzou Murakami; Rei Kobayashi; Atsuhito Sekimoto; Miho Saeki; Kosuke Toyofuku; Masako Kato; Hidenori Shinjo; Yoshinori Ito; Mizuki Takei; Chiori Murata; Yoshimitsu Ohgiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Overnight preliminary head CT interpretations provided by residents: locations of misidentified intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  W M Strub; J L Leach; T Tomsick; A Vagal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Evaluating the accuracy of emergency medicine resident interpretations of abdominal CTs in patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Authors:  Mun Ju Kang; Min Seob Sim; Tae Gun Shin; Ik Joon Jo; Hyoung Gon Song; Keun Jeong Song; Yeon Kwon Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.