Literature DB >> 16862403

Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE fluoroscopic equipment.

Barry Belanger1, John Boudry.   

Abstract

In this article, we present GE Healthcare's design philosophy and implementation of X-ray imaging systems with dose management for pediatric patients, as embodied in its current radiography and fluoroscopy and interventional cardiovascular X-ray product offerings. First, we present a basic framework of image quality and dose in the context of a cost-benefit trade-off, with the development of the concept of imaging dose efficiency. A set of key metrics of image quality and dose efficiency is presented, including X-ray source efficiency, detector quantum efficiency (DQE), detector dynamic range, and temporal response, with an explanation of the clinical relevance of each. Second, we present design methods for automatically selecting optimal X-ray technique parameters (kVp, mA, pulse width, and spectral filtration) in real time for various clinical applications. These methods are based on an optimization scheme where patient skin dose is minimized for a target desired image contrast-to-noise ratio. Operator display of skin dose and Dose-Area Product (DAP) is covered, as well. Third, system controls and predefined protocols available to the operator are explained in the context of dose management and the need to meet varying clinical procedure imaging demands. For example, fluoroscopic dose rate is adjustable over a range of 20:1 to adapt to different procedure requirements. Fourth, we discuss the impact of image processing techniques upon dose minimization. In particular, two such techniques, dynamic range compression through adaptive multiband spectral filtering and fluoroscopic noise reduction, are explored in some detail. Fifth, we review a list of system dose-reduction features, including automatic spectral filtration, virtual collimation, variable-rate pulsed fluoroscopic, grid and no-grid techniques, and fluoroscopic loop replay with store. In addition, we describe a new feature that automatically minimizes the patient-to-detector distance, along with an estimate of its dose reduction potential. Finally, two recently developed imaging techniques and their potential effect on dose utilization are discussed. Specifically, we discuss the dose benefits of rotational angiography and low frame rate imaging with advanced image processing in lieu of higher-dose digital subtraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16862403      PMCID: PMC2663641          DOI: 10.1007/s00247-006-0228-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  4 in total

1.  Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter?

Authors:  J P Moy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A new tool for benchmarking cardiovascular fluoroscopes.

Authors:  S Balter; F A Heupler; P J Lin; M H Wondrow
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics.

Authors:  H G Chotas; J T Dobbins; C E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy.

Authors:  R Aufrichtig; P Xue; C W Thomas; G C Gilmore; D L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.071

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Novel method to determine recursive filtration and noise reduction in fluoroscopic imaging - a comparison of four different vendors.

Authors:  Bente Konst; Jacob Nøtthellen; Stine Nalum Naess; Magnus Båth
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 2.  Customized imaging for children and obese people: key issues and strategies.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Effective radiation dose in computed tomographic angiography of the chest and diagnostic cardiac catheterization in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Timotheus G Watson; Eugene Mah; U Joseph Schoepf; Lydia King; Walter Huda; Anthony M Hlavacek
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Comparison of pediatric radiation dose and vessel visibility on angiographic systems using piglets as a surrogate: antiscatter grid removal vs. lower detector air kerma settings with a grid - a preclinical investigation.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; John M Racadio; Todd A Abruzzo; Neil D Johnson; Manish N Patel; Kamlesh U Kukreja; Mark J H den Hartog; Bart P A Hoonaert; Rami A Nachabe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.