Mitsuhiro Tozaki1, Kunihiko Fukuda. 1. Present address: Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Breast Center, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan 296-8602. e-tozaki@keh.biglobe.ne.jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess an interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors and high-spatial-resolution MR images in lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 30 consecutive lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. MRI was performed on a 1.5-T scanner using the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence. The distribution patterns were classified into three categories: single quadrant/solitary lesion (linear), single quadrant/grouped lesion (focal, regional, segmental), and multiquadrant lesion (multiple regions, diffuse). The presence of a ductal pattern was assessed in the enhancing lesions after the tumor distribution had been decided. In addition to the BI-RADS MRI descriptors, the presence of clustered ring enhancement was also assessed in heterogeneous enhancing lesions. RESULTS: The most frequent morphologic finding among the benign lesions was a linear pattern (50%) followed by homogeneous internal enhancement (42%), whereas a segmental pattern (56%) (p = 0.003), heterogeneous internal enhancement (44%), and clustered ring enhancement (44%) (p = 0.01) were the most frequent findings in malignant lesions. The features with the highest positive predictive value for carcinoma were a segmental distribution (100%), a clustered ring enhancement (100%), and a clumped internal architecture (88%). Using this interpretation model, the positive predictive value for carcinoma was 94%. CONCLUSION: A combination of BI-RADS MRI descriptors and clustered ring enhancement criteria is useful for the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess an interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors and high-spatial-resolution MR images in lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 30 consecutive lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. MRI was performed on a 1.5-T scanner using the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence. The distribution patterns were classified into three categories: single quadrant/solitary lesion (linear), single quadrant/grouped lesion (focal, regional, segmental), and multiquadrant lesion (multiple regions, diffuse). The presence of a ductal pattern was assessed in the enhancing lesions after the tumor distribution had been decided. In addition to the BI-RADS MRI descriptors, the presence of clustered ring enhancement was also assessed in heterogeneous enhancing lesions. RESULTS: The most frequent morphologic finding among the benign lesions was a linear pattern (50%) followed by homogeneous internal enhancement (42%), whereas a segmental pattern (56%) (p = 0.003), heterogeneous internal enhancement (44%), and clustered ring enhancement (44%) (p = 0.01) were the most frequent findings in malignant lesions. The features with the highest positive predictive value for carcinoma were a segmental distribution (100%), a clustered ring enhancement (100%), and a clumped internal architecture (88%). Using this interpretation model, the positive predictive value for carcinoma was 94%. CONCLUSION: A combination of BI-RADS MRI descriptors and clustered ring enhancement criteria is useful for the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement.
Authors: Maria Adele Marino; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Thomas H Helbich; Klaus Preidler; Pascal A T Baltzer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Benndorf; Matthias Dietzel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-11-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: K Pinker; H Bickel; T H Helbich; S Gruber; P Dubsky; U Pluschnig; M Rudas; Z Bago-Horvath; M Weber; S Trattnig; W Bogner Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 5.315