Literature DB >> 16859865

The clinical context and patient participation in post-diagnostic consultations.

Richard L Street1, Howard S Gordon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although patient participation is an important feature of patient-centered health care, few studies have examined how the clinical context affects patient involvement in medical encounters. This investigation examined the way patients communicate with physicians in two diverse post-diagnostic settings, post-angiogram consultations and initial lung cancer visits.
METHODS: From transcripts and audiorecordings of post-angiogram consultations (n=88) and initial lung cancer visits (n=62) within a VA hospital in the United States, three measures of patient participation were coded--number of active participation behaviors (questions, acts of assertiveness, and expressions of concern), proportion of patients' utterances in the form of active participation, and conversational involvement (ratio of patient utterances to physician plus patient utterances). Mixed linear regression procedures assessed the independent effects of the clinical setting, physicians' facilitative communication (partnership-building and supportive talk), and patients' age, education, and ethnicity on patient participation.
RESULTS: Not only was their less talk in the post-angiogram consultations compared with the lung cancer visits, heart patients also were less conversationally involved (accounted for 25% of the talk) than were lung cancer patients (45% of the talk) and their doctors used proportionally less facilitative talk than did the lung cancer physicians. In both settings, patients were more conversationally engaged when proportionally more of the physicians' talk was facilitative.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical context has a profound effect on patient participation. However, within individual settings, physicians can increase patient involvement by using partnering and supportive communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians and administrators should assess clinical practices that restrict patient involvement in ways that could affect quality of decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16859865     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  10 in total

1.  The ACTive Intervention in Hospice Interdisciplinary Team Meetings: Exploring family caregiver and hospice team communication.

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Paula Baldwin
Journal:  J Comput Mediat Commun       Date:  2010-04-01

2.  How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients' health beliefs.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Paul Haidet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Ask, understand, remember: a brief measure of patient communication self-efficacy within clinical encounters.

Authors:  Marla L Clayman; Anjali U Pandit; Ashley R Bergeron; Kenzie A Cameron; Emily Ross; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

4.  Healthcare Provider Communication Patterns during Consultations about Treating Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yolanda M Hyde; Barbara Germino; Merle Mishel; Richard L Street; Lenora Campbell; Dale Brashers; Thomas P Mccoy
Journal:  J Best Pract Health Prof Divers       Date:  2013

5.  Participation of chronic patients in medical consultations: patients' perceived efficacy, barriers and interest in support.

Authors:  Inge Henselmans; Monique Heijmans; Jany Rademakers; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Patients' reflections on communication in the second-opinion hematology-oncology consultation.

Authors:  Roberta E Goldman; Amy Sullivan; Anthony L Back; Stewart C Alexander; Robin K Matsuyama; Stephanie J Lee
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-01-09

Review 7.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the VA health care system: a systematic review.

Authors:  Somnath Saha; Michele Freeman; Joahd Toure; Kimberly M Tippens; Christine Weeks; Said Ibrahim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Lung and colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs health care system.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; Christina D Williams; Alice G Fortune-Britt
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Active participation of patients with type 2 diabetes in consultations with their primary care practice nurses - what helps and what hinders: a qualitative study.

Authors:  E du Pon; A T Wildeboer; A A van Dooren; H J G Bilo; N Kleefstra; S van Dulmen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Integrated care for resected early stage lung cancer: innovations and exploring patient needs.

Authors:  Jan Ho; Annette McWilliams; Jon Emery; Christobel Saunders; Christopher Reid; Suzanne Robinson; Fraser Brims
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2017-06-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.