Yolanda M Hyde1, Barbara Germino2, Merle Mishel2, Richard L Street3, Lenora Campbell4, Dale Brashers5, Thomas P Mccoy1. 1. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina. 2. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel-Hill, Chapel-Hill, North Carolina. 3. College of Nursing, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas. 4. School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 5. College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disparities in mortality in prostate cancer may reflect differences in healthcare providers' communication. OBJECTIVE: This study examined physicians' communication with African American and Caucasian men when making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer to determine whether information-giving and partnership-building behaviors varied by the age, education level, and race of the patient. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of data from a larger study examining decisionmaking among men with prostate cancer. Verbatim transcripts of physician communication with 13 African American and 32 Caucasian patients were coded using a well-established scheme. RESULTS: Physicians tended to use information-giving and partnership-building behaviors more often with patients who were Caucasian, but this practice was tempered by the patient's age or education level. CONCLUSION: Information-giving and partnership-building behaviors should be studied relative to patient outcomes, such as treatment adherence and satisfaction. Communication is a two-way interaction, and patients' perceptions should be included in future studies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Biases, assumptions, and differential behavior toward patients who are older, minorities, or less educated must be addressed during all healthcare providers' socialization and education. All will benefit from their education in communication and partnership-building with patients.
BACKGROUND: Disparities in mortality in prostate cancer may reflect differences in healthcare providers' communication. OBJECTIVE: This study examined physicians' communication with African American and Caucasian men when making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer to determine whether information-giving and partnership-building behaviors varied by the age, education level, and race of the patient. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of data from a larger study examining decisionmaking among men with prostate cancer. Verbatim transcripts of physician communication with 13 African American and 32 Caucasian patients were coded using a well-established scheme. RESULTS: Physicians tended to use information-giving and partnership-building behaviors more often with patients who were Caucasian, but this practice was tempered by the patient's age or education level. CONCLUSION: Information-giving and partnership-building behaviors should be studied relative to patient outcomes, such as treatment adherence and satisfaction. Communication is a two-way interaction, and patients' perceptions should be included in future studies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Biases, assumptions, and differential behavior toward patients who are older, minorities, or less educated must be addressed during all healthcare providers' socialization and education. All will benefit from their education in communication and partnership-building with patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer patient; health provider communication; information-giving; partnership building; physician communication
Authors: V Diane Woods; Susanne B Montgomery; Juan Carlos Belliard; Johnny Ramirez-Johnson; Colwick M Wilson Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Clement K Gwede; Julio Pow-Sang; John Seigne; Randy Heysek; Mohamed Helal; Kristin Shade; Alan Cantor; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Howard S Gordon; Richard L Street; Barbara F Sharf; P Adam Kelly; Julianne Souchek Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544