Literature DB >> 16858600

[Compensation for presbyopia using contact lenses].

G Bischoff1.   

Abstract

Contact lens fitting for presbyotic patients needs more than simple fitting shill; patients need additional psychological support. The wearer has to accept optical quality reduction due to the multifocality of the lens design. In general, the technical fitting of presbyotic contact lenses is comparable to monofocal systems. They work with the same rules of performance. The difference lies in the principles of correction by the lens itself. Simple presbyotic systems use uncorrected optical aberration to widen depth perception. These lenses are suitable for young presbyopes, up to a need of 1 diopter plus power for near vision. Uncorrected aspherical designs have a multifocal effect which can be used for presbyotic lenses. There are contact lenses on the market with simultaneous imaging, which is based on concentric rings around the near or distance centre. Another principles are based on segmented reading portions in the lower part of the lens, also called alternating systems. These very few design variations are the basis for the various specific models which are sold on the market today. The results of the fitting can never be foreseen as subjective and psychological aspects of the wearer overlay the objective results. Thus, the fitter needs experience and patient understanding, combined with fundamental knowledge of the specific lens type used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16858600     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1383-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  8 in total

1.  Quality of vision with presbyopic contact lens correction: subjective and light sensitivity rating.

Authors:  S Alongi; M Rolando; G Corallo; C Siniscalchi; M Monaco; S Saccà; G Verrastro; S Menoni; G B Ravera; G Calabria
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.

Authors:  Michel Guillon; Cecile Maissa; Philip Cooper; Karine Girard-Claudon; Timothy R Poling
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  2002-04

3.  The effect of add power on distance vision with the acuvue bifocal contact lens.

Authors:  David Ardaya; Giulia DeVuono; Ivy Lin; Annie Neutgens; Peter Bergenske; Patrick Caroline; Jennifer Smythe
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2004-03

4.  Verification of the vertex powers of varifocal rigid contact lenses.

Authors:  Craig A Woods
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Investigation of the performance of the Menifocal Z gas-permeable bifocal contact lens during continuous wear.

Authors:  Carol Lakkis; Silvia A Goldenberg; Craig A Woods
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; G Lynn Mitchell; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  [Gas permeable scleral lenses as a conservative treatment option for extreme corneal ectasias and severe dry eye].

Authors:  K T Hänisch; B Neppert; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo.

Authors:  Sudi Patel; Mohammed Fakhry; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  2002-10
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Functional results after bilateral intrastromal femtosecond laser correction of presbyopia].

Authors:  R Khoramnia; M P Holzer; A Fitting; G U Auffarth; T M Rabsilber
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.