Literature DB >> 16858081

Work design and management in the manufacturing sector: development and validation of the Work Organisation Assessment Questionnaire.

A Griffiths1, T Cox, M Karanika, S Khan, J M Tomás.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of a new context-specific questionnaire for the assessment of work and organisational factors. The Work Organisation Assessment Questionnaire (WOAQ) was developed as part of a risk assessment and risk reduction methodology for hazards inherent in the design and management of work in the manufacturing sector.
METHOD: Two studies were conducted. Data were collected from 524 white- and blue-collar employees from a range of manufacturing companies. Exploratory factor analysis was carried out on 28 items that described the most commonly reported failures of work design and management in companies in the manufacturing sector. Concurrent validity data were also collected. A reliability study was conducted with a further 156 employees.
RESULTS: Principal component analysis, with varimax rotation, revealed a strong 28-item, five factor structure. The factors were named: quality of relationships with management, reward and recognition, workload, quality of relationships with colleagues, and quality of physical environment. Analyses also revealed a more general summative factor. Results indicated that the questionnaire has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability and validity. Being associated with poor employee health and changes in health related behaviour, the WOAQ factors are possible hazards. It is argued that the strength of those associations offers some estimation of risk. Feedback from the organisations involved indicated that the WOAQ was easy to use and meaningful for them as part of their risk assessment procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: The studies reported here describe a model of the hazards to employee health and health related behaviour inherent in the design and management of work in the manufacturing sector. It offers an instrument for their assessment. The scales derived which form the WOAQ were shown to be reliable, valid, and meaningful to the user population.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16858081      PMCID: PMC2078053          DOI: 10.1136/oem.2005.023671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  5 in total

1.  Validity of the HSE stress tool: an investigation within four organizations by the Corporate Health and Performance Group.

Authors:  Chris Main; Nicholas Glozier; Ian Wright
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 2.  Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: a review of the literature with reference to methodological issues.

Authors:  D Zapf; C Dormann; M Frese
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1996-04

3.  Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?

Authors:  J P Wanous; A E Reichers; M J Hudy
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1997-04

Review 4.  Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.

Authors:  E L Idler; Y Benyamini
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1997-03

5.  The nature and assessment of general well-being.

Authors:  T Cox; M Thirlaway; G Gotts; S Cox
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.006

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Health promotion site selection blues: barriers to participation and implementation.

Authors:  Martin Cherniack; Tim Morse; Robert Henning; Adam Seidner; Laura Punnett
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Comorbid Depression and Other Predictors of PTSD Severity in Urban Public Transit Employees.

Authors:  Ravi Shah; Rosane Nisenbaum; Catherine Classen; Rahel Eynan; Paul S Links
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2016-06-09

3.  Workstyle and Musculoskeletal Discomfort (MSD): Exploring the Influence of Work Culture in Malaysia.

Authors:  Ismail Maakip; Tessa Keegel; Jodi Oakman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-12

4.  Factors in adoption of a fire department wellness program: champ-and-chief model.

Authors:  Hannah Kuehl; Linda Mabry; Diane L Elliot; Kerry S Kuehl; Kim C Favorite
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Requirements for more effective prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Wendy Macdonald; Jodi Oakman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Leader-Member Exchange across two hierarchical levels of leadership: concurrent influences on work characteristics and employee psychological health.

Authors:  Maria Karanika-Murray; Kimberley J Bartholomew; Glenn A Williams; Tom Cox
Journal:  Work Stress       Date:  2015-03-02

7.  The Maugeri Stress Index - reduced form: a questionnaire for job stress assessment.

Authors:  Davide Massidda; Ines Giorgi; Giulio Vidotto; Salvatore Tringali; Marcello Imbriani; Paola Baiardi; Giorgio Bertolotti
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  The APHIRM toolkit: an evidence-based system for workplace MSD risk management.

Authors:  Jodi Oakman; Wendy Macdonald
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.