Literature DB >> 16856753

In vitro gastrointestinal bioavailability of arsenic in soils collected near CCA-treated utility poles.

Priscilla Pouschat1, Gerald J Zagury.   

Abstract

Because of the potentially high arsenic concentrations found in soils immediately adjacent to chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood structures and utility poles, CCA-contaminated soil ingestion may be a significant exposure route to arsenic for children. Therefore, a strong need exists to provide accurate data on oral relative bioavailability (RBA) of arsenic (in vivo or in vitro) in field-collected CCA-contaminated soils. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated soils collected near in-service CCA-treated utility poles, (2) to determine the influence of soil properties and arsenic fractionation on arsenic bioaccessibility, and (3) to estimate an average daily arsenic intake from incidental soil ingestion. Arsenic bioaccessibility (in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method) was determined on surface soil samples collected immediately adjacent to 12 CCA-treated utility poles after 18 months of service. Bioaccessible arsenic was also determined in 3 certified reference materials. Total arsenic concentrations in soils (<300 microm) varied from 37 +/- 2 to 251 +/- 12 mg/kg, irrespective of soil organic matter contentwith the major soil-bound arsenic species being As(V). Arsenic bioaccessibility ranged between 25.0 +/- 2.7 and 66.3 +/- 2.3% (mean value 40.7 +/- 14.9%). The mean value was in agreement with the in vivo arsenic RBA reported by Casteel et al. (2003) in soil near CCA-treated utility poles. Bioaccessible arsenic was positively correlated with total organic carbon content (r2 = 0.36, p < 0.05) and with water-soluble arsenic (2 = 0.51, p < 0.01), and was negatively correlated with clay content (r2 = 0.43, p < 0.05). Using conservative exposure parameters, the mean daily arsenic intake from incidental ingestion of contaminated soil near CCA-treated utility poles was 0.18 +/- 0.09 microg As kg(-1) d(-1). This arsenic intake appeared negligible compared to the daily intake of inorganic arsenic from water and food ingestion for children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16856753     DOI: 10.1021/es0604156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

Review 1.  Understanding arsenic dynamics in agronomic systems to predict and prevent uptake by crop plants.

Authors:  Tracy Punshon; Brian P Jackson; Andrew A Meharg; Todd Warczack; Kirk Scheckel; Mary Lou Guerinot
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Assessment of bioaccessibility and exposure risk of arsenic and lead in urban soils of Guangzhou City, China.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Wei Yin; Longbin Huang; Ganlin Zhang; Yuguo Zhao
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Valorization of a treated soil via amendments: fractionation and oral bioaccessibility of Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn.

Authors:  Gerald J Zagury; Jhony A Rincon Bello; Mert Guney
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Lung bioaccessibility of contaminants in particulate matter of geological origin.

Authors:  Mert Guney; Robert P Chapuis; Gerald J Zagury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Lead (Pb) and arsenic (As) bioaccessibility in various soils from south China.

Authors:  Yanshan Cui; Xiaochen Chen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Arsenic bioaccessibility in a gold mining area: a health risk assessment for children.

Authors:  Fábio Benedito Ono; Luiz Roberto Guimarães Guilherme; Evanise Silva Penido; Geila Santos Carvalho; Beverley Hale; Regla Toujaguez; Jochen Bundschuh
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Arsenic distribution and bioaccessibility across particle fractions in historically contaminated soils.

Authors:  E Smith; J Weber; A L Juhasz
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 8.  Environmental and Health Hazards of Chromated Copper Arsenate-Treated Wood: A Review.

Authors:  Simone Morais; Henrique M A C Fonseca; Sónia M R Oliveira; Helena Oliveira; Vivek Kumar Gupta; Bechan Sharma; Maria de Lourdes Pereira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.