Literature DB >> 19224377

Arsenic distribution and bioaccessibility across particle fractions in historically contaminated soils.

E Smith1, J Weber, A L Juhasz.   

Abstract

Incidental soil ingestion is a common contaminant exposure pathway for humans, notably children. It is widely accepted that the inclusion of total soil metal concentrations greatly overestimates the risk through soil ingestion for people due to contaminant bioavailability constraints. The assumption also assumes that the contaminant distribution and the bioaccessible fraction is consistent across all particle sizes. In this study, we investigated the distribution of arsenic across five particle size fractions as well as arsenic bioaccessibility in the <250-, <100-, <10- and 2.5-microm soil particle fractions in 50 contaminated soils. The distribution of arsenic was generally uniform across the larger particle size fractions but increased markedly in the <2.5-microm soil particle fraction. The marked increase in arsenic concentration in the <2.5-microm fraction was associated with a marked increase in the iron content. Arsenic bioaccessibility, in contrast, increased with decreasing particle size. The mean arsenic bioaccessibility increased from 25 +/- 16% in the <250-microm soil particle fraction to 42 +/- 23% in the <10-microm soil particle fraction. These results indicate that the assumption of static arsenic bioaccessibility values across particle size fractions should be reconsidered if the ingested material is enriched with small particle fractions such as those found in household dust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224377     DOI: 10.1007/s10653-009-9249-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  25 in total

1.  Arsenic in Australian environment: an overview.

Authors:  E Smith; J Smith; L Smith; T Biswas; R Correll; R Naidu
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.269

Review 2.  Underlying issues in bioaccessibility and bioavailability: experimental methods.

Authors:  K Hund-Rinke; W Kördel
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Seasonal deposition of housedusts onto household surfaces.

Authors:  R D Edwards; E J Yurkow; P J Lioy
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Distribution and nature of arsenic along former railway corridors of South Australia.

Authors:  E Smith; J Smith; R Naidu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Apportioning the sources of lead in house dusts in the London borough of Richmond, England.

Authors:  A Hunt; D L Johnson; I Thornton; J M Watt
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 6.  Widespread arsenic contamination of soils in residential areas and public spaces: an emerging regulatory or medical crisis?

Authors:  D A Belluck; S L Benjamin; P Baveye; J Sampson; B Johnson
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.032

7.  Decreasing arsenic bioaccessibility/bioavailability in soils with iron amendments.

Authors:  Jonathan L Subacz; Mark O Barnett; Philip M Jardine; Melanie A Stewart
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 2.269

8.  In vitro assessment of arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated (anthropogenic and geogenic) soils.

Authors:  Albert L Juhasz; Euan Smith; John Weber; Matthew Rees; Allan Rofe; Tim Kuchel; Lloyd Sansom; Ravi Naidu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils.

Authors:  Albert L Juhasz; Euan Smith; John Weber; Matthew Rees; Allan Rofe; Tim Kuchel; Lloyd Sansom; Ravi Naidu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Chemical extraction methods to assess bioavailable arsenic in soil and solid media.

Authors:  R R Rodriguez; N T Basta; S W Casteel; F P Armstrong; D C Ward
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

View more
  6 in total

1.  Arsenic in the environment--risks and management strategies.

Authors:  Ravi Naidu; Prosun Bhattacharya
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 2.  Assessing the bioavailability and bioaccessibility of metals and metalloids.

Authors:  Jack C Ng; Albert Juhasz; Euan Smith; Ravi Naidu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Lead and Arsenic Bioaccessibility and Speciation as a Function of Soil Particle Size.

Authors:  Ranju R Karna; Matt Noerpel; Aaron R Betts; Kirk G Scheckel
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.751

4.  In vitro assessment of arsenic mobility in historical mine waste dust using simulated lung fluid.

Authors:  Rachael Martin; Kim Dowling; Scott Nankervis; Dora Pearce; Singarayer Florentine; Stafford McKnight
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Trace metal content in inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5-10 and PM2.5) collected from historical mine waste deposits using a laboratory-based approach.

Authors:  Rachael Martin; Kim Dowling; Dora C Pearce; Singarayer Florentine; Stafford McKnight; Eduard Stelcer; David D Cohen; Attila Stopic; John W Bennett
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 6.  In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability: relevant to human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Karen D Bradham; Gary L Diamond; Michele Burgess; Albert Juhasz; Julie M Klotzbach; Mark Maddaloni; Clay Nelson; Kirk Scheckel; Sophia M Serda; Marc Stifelman; David J Thomas
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 8.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.