Literature DB >> 16855943

[Compensation of corneal astigmatism with toric intraocular lens: results of a multicentre study].

H B Dick1, F Krummenauer, L Tröber.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This clinical trial was conducted to evaluate visual acuity, refraction and rotation after implantation of the foldable toric intraocular lens (IOL) MicroSil Toric. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 68 eyes of 48 patients from four different surgical departments were examined over a follow-up of three months after cataract surgery.
RESULTS: An individually produced IOL with cylindrical correction between 2.0 and 12.0 D was implanted in all eyes. Postoperatively, 68 % of the eyes achieved an uncorrected visual acuity (VA) of 0.5 or better, 12 % achieved 1.0 or better. A corrected VA of 0.5 or better was achieved by 85 %, 31 % achieved a corrected VA of 1.0 or better. Corrected VA improved by 3 (+/- 2) lines. The uncorrected VA improved by 6.0 lines in the mean. The increases in uncorrected and corrected VA were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The efficacy index amounted to 1.1 in the median and 1.3 (+/- 1.5) in the mean. Residual refraction (spherical equivalent) was 0.89 D (+/- 0.7 D) in the mean and was reduced by 5.14 D (+/- 4.78 D) in the mean. The total astigmatic error was reduced both in a statistically as well as in a clinically significant manner from 4.6 D (+/- 2.3 D) to 1.12 D (+/- 0.9 D) in the mean. 75 % of eyes needed a postoperative cylindrical correction of less than 1.5 D, 95 % less than 2.25 D. Corneal astigmatism was not changed significantly (p = 0,435). The surgically induced astigmatism (Naeser) amounted to 0.7 D in the median. In 85 % of the cases IOL rotation was less than 5 degrees. 15 % of the IOLs rotated more than 5 degrees, one IOL more than 10 degrees (max. 28 degrees). Patients ranked their surgical outcome on a scale from 1 (very good) to 6 (poor) which resulted in a mean score of 1.9 (+/- 1.0; min. 1.0; max. 5.0). No clinically relevant correlations of clinical parameters and satisfaction were detected.
CONCLUSION: Implantation of the foldable, toric IOL with Z-haptics decreased the refractive error and improved postoperative visual outcome. This IOL was suitable for low as well as for high astigmatism. IOL rotation was low during the follow-up of three months resulting in sufficient correction of the pre-existing astigmatism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16855943     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  8 in total

1.  [Correction of corneal astigmatism with toric lenses : Theory and clinical aspects].

Authors:  A Langenbucher; A Viestenz; N Szentmáry; A Viestenz; T Eppig; B Seitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Toric IOL positioning with a no-touch head-up display axis alignment.

Authors:  J Luebke; D Boehringer; P Maier; T Reinhard; P Eberwein
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  [Predictability of residual astigmatism after implantation of posterior chamber toric lenses].

Authors:  D Mies; T Klink; W Eisenbarth; L M Meyer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Toric IOLs after cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; T M Rabsilber
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Three Methods for Correction of Astigmatism during Phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Hossein Mohammad-Rabei; Elham Mohammad-Rabei; Goldis Espandar; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Mohammad Reza Jafarinasab; Seyed Javad Hashemian; Sepehr Feizi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 6.  Toric intraocular lenses: Expanding indications and preoperative and surgical considerations to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Vivek Mahendrapratap Singh; Muralidhar Ramappa; Somasheila I Murthy; Audrey Talley Rostov
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 7.  [Toric intraocular lenses and correction of astigmatism].

Authors:  Arne Viestenz; S Walter; Anja Viestenz; W Behrens-Baumann; A Langenbucher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.174

8.  Comparison Between Digital and Manual Marking for Toric Intraocular Lenses: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Abdel Hamid Elhofi; Hany Ahmed Helaly
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.