OBJECTIVE: Monitoring of ventilation performance during cardiopulmonary resuscitation would be desirable to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. To investigate the potential for measuring ventilation rate and inspiration time, we calculated the correlation in waveform between transthoracic impedance measured via defibrillator pads and tidal volume given by a ventilator. DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: Emergency department of a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: A convenience sample of mechanical ventilated patients (n = 32), cardiac arrest patients (n = 20), and patients after restoration of spontaneous circulation (n = 31) older than 18 were eligible. INTERVENTIONS: The Heartstart 4000SP defibrillator (Laerdal Medical Cooperation, Stavanger, Norway) with additional capabilities of recording thoracic impedance changes was used. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The relationship between impedance change and tidal volume (impedance coefficient) was calculated. The mean (sd) correlations between the impedance waveform and the tidal volume waveform in the patient groups studied were .971 (.027), .969 (.032), and .967 (.035), respectively. The mean (sd) impedance coefficient for all patients in the study was .00194 (.0078) Omega/mL, and the mean (sd) specific (weight-corrected) impedance coefficient was .152 (.048) Omega/kg/mL. The measured thorax impedance change for different tidal volumes (400-1000 mL) was approximately linear. CONCLUSIONS: The impedance sensor of a defibrillator is accurate in identifying tidal volumes, when chest compressions are interrupted. This also allows quantifying ventilation rates and inspiration times. However this technology, at its present state, provides only limited practical means for exact tidal volume estimation.
OBJECTIVE: Monitoring of ventilation performance during cardiopulmonary resuscitation would be desirable to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. To investigate the potential for measuring ventilation rate and inspiration time, we calculated the correlation in waveform between transthoracic impedance measured via defibrillator pads and tidal volume given by a ventilator. DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: Emergency department of a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: A convenience sample of mechanical ventilated patients (n = 32), cardiac arrestpatients (n = 20), and patients after restoration of spontaneous circulation (n = 31) older than 18 were eligible. INTERVENTIONS: The Heartstart 4000SP defibrillator (Laerdal Medical Cooperation, Stavanger, Norway) with additional capabilities of recording thoracic impedance changes was used. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The relationship between impedance change and tidal volume (impedance coefficient) was calculated. The mean (sd) correlations between the impedance waveform and the tidal volume waveform in the patient groups studied were .971 (.027), .969 (.032), and .967 (.035), respectively. The mean (sd) impedance coefficient for all patients in the study was .00194 (.0078) Omega/mL, and the mean (sd) specific (weight-corrected) impedance coefficient was .152 (.048) Omega/kg/mL. The measured thorax impedance change for different tidal volumes (400-1000 mL) was approximately linear. CONCLUSIONS: The impedance sensor of a defibrillator is accurate in identifying tidal volumes, when chest compressions are interrupted. This also allows quantifying ventilation rates and inspiration times. However this technology, at its present state, provides only limited practical means for exact tidal volume estimation.
Authors: Andrew D McInnes; Robert M Sutton; Alberto Orioles; Akira Nishisaki; Dana Niles; Benjamin S Abella; Matthew R Maltese; Robert A Berg; Vinay Nadkarni Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Mary P Chang; Yuanzheng Lu; Brian Leroux; Elisabete Aramendi Ecenarro; Pamela Owens; Henry E Wang; Ahamed H Idris Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2019-05-18 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jason Coult; Jennifer Blackwood; Thomas D Rea; Peter J Kudenchuk; Heemun Kwok Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Mathias Zuercher; Ronald W Hilwig; James Ranger-Moore; Jon Nysaether; Vinay M Nadkarni; Marc D Berg; Karl B Kern; Robert Sutton; Robert A Berg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Dana P Edelson; Joar Eilevstjønn; Elizabeth K Weidman; Elizabeth Retzer; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Benjamin S Abella Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2009-12-29 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jose Julio Gutiérrez; Mikel Leturiondo; Sofía Ruiz de Gauna; Jesus María Ruiz; Luis Alberto Leturiondo; Digna María González-Otero; Dana Zive; James Knox Russell; Mohamud Daya Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240