Literature DB >> 16849851

New techniques to evaluate esophageal function.

Daniel Sifrim1, Kathleen Blondeau.   

Abstract

Classical techniques like videofluoroscopy, stationary manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry are routinely used in the clinic to study patients with dysphagia, chest pain and reflux-related symptoms. Although many patients can be accurately diagnosed and their therapy successfully guided with these techniques, in many other patients, non-obstructive dysphagia or chest pain cannot be attributed to clear fluoroscopic or manometric abnormalities. Furthermore, ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry often shows a poor association between spontaneous acid reflux events and esophageal or extraesophageal symptoms, particularly in patients 'on' treatment. Non-obstructive dysphagia can be assessed with high-resolution manometry to detect segmental disturbances of peristalsis, increase in pressure gradient across the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or abnormal axial movement of the LES during esophageal spasm. Impedance evaluation of bolus transit is a non-radiological method that can evaluate the functional relevance of manometric abnormalities. Patients with non-cardiac chest pain that do not respond to proton pump inhibitor therapy can be further assessed with intraluminal high-frequency ultrasound to detect sustained esophageal contractions of the longitudinal muscle layer. Impedance planimetry, with multimodal esophageal stimulation, may contribute to evaluate the sensitivity to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimuli. Finally, patients with persistent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in spite of adequate treatment with proton pump inhibitors may still have weakly acidic reflux and/or bile reflux associated with their symptoms. These types of refluxates can now be detected with combinations of pH-impedance or pH-Bilitec monitoring. This review will describe the available new techniques to evaluate patients with non-obstructive dysphagia, non-cardiac chest pain and persistent gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16849851     DOI: 10.1159/000092877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis        ISSN: 0257-2753            Impact factor:   2.404


  8 in total

Review 1.  Gastroesophageal reflux/laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  M N Kotby; O Hassan; Aly M N El-Makhzangy; M Farahat; P Milad
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  High resolution manometry patterns distinguish acid sensitivity in non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  V M Kushnir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Significant pressure differences between solid-state and water-perfused systems in lower esophageal sphincter measurement.

Authors:  Philipp Gehwolf; Ronald A Hinder; Kenneth R DeVault; Michael Edlinger; Heinz F Wykypiel; Paul J Klingler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Topographical plots of esophageal distension and contraction: effects of posture on esophageal peristalsis and bolus transport.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Hyun Joo Song; Young-Hoon Youn; Xinhuan Qiu; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Clinical usefulness of esophagogastric junction distensibility measurement in patients with achalasia before and after peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Authors:  Junsu Chang; In Kyung Yoo; Süleyman Günay; Zehra Betül Paköz; Joo Young Cho
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms not responding to proton pump inhibitor: GERD, NERD, NARD, esophageal hypersensitivity or dyspepsia?

Authors:  Mohammad Bashashati; Reza A Hejazi; Christopher N Andrews; Martin A Storr
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-04-09

7.  Swallowing disorders: proposal of a method for forensic medicine assessment.

Authors:  B Fattori; F Ursino; F Matteucci; V Mallardi; A Nacci
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 8.  What Is the Future of Impedance Planimetry in Gastroenterology?

Authors:  Hans Gregersen; Kar Man Lo
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.