Literature DB >> 16849254

The magnetic compass mechanisms of birds and rodents are based on different physical principles.

Peter Thalau1, Thorsten Ritz, Hynek Burda, Regina E Wegner, Roswitha Wiltschko.   

Abstract

Recently, oscillating magnetic fields in the MHz-range were introduced as a useful diagnostic tool to identify the mechanism underlying magnetoreception. The effect of very weak high-frequency fields on the orientation of migratory birds indicates that the avian magnetic compass is based on a radical pair mechanism. To analyse the nature of the magnetic compass of mammals, we tested rodents, Ansell's mole-rats, using their tendency to build their nests in the southern part of the arena as a criterion whether or not they could orient. In contrast to birds, their orientation was not disrupted when a broad-band field of 0.1-10MHz of 85nT or a 1.315MHz field of 480nT was added to the static geomagnetic field of 46000nT. Even increasing the intensity of the 1.315MHz field (Zeeman frequency in the local geomagnetic field) to 4800nT, more than a tenth of the static field, the mole-rats remained unaffected and continued to build their nests in the south. These results indicate that in contrast to that of birds, their magnetic compass does not involve radical pair processes; it seems to be based on a fundamentally different principle, which probably involves magnetite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16849254      PMCID: PMC1664646          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  10 in total

1.  A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds.

Authors:  T Ritz; S Adem; K Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Magnetic orientation and magnetoreception in birds and other animals.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Two different types of light-dependent responses to magnetic fields in birds.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Thorsten Ritz; Katrin Stapput; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Magnetic compass orientation of migratory birds in the presence of a 1.315 MHz oscillating field.

Authors:  Peter Thalau; Thorsten Ritz; Katrin Stapput; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-12-22

6.  Magnetic compass orientation in the subterranean rodent Cryptomys hottentotus (Bathyergidae).

Authors:  H Burda; S Marhold; T Westenberger; R Wiltschko; W Wiltschko
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1990-05-15

7.  A possible magnetic transducer in birds.

Authors:  E D Yorke
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-03-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Subcortical visual system of the African mole-rat Cryptomys anselli: to see or not to see?

Authors:  Pavel Nemec; Hynek Burda; Leo Peichl
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Two magnetoreception pathways in a migratory salamander.

Authors:  J B Phillips
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field detection in animals.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink; J L Gould
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.973

  10 in total
  28 in total

1.  Cryptochrome: A photoreceptor with the properties of a magnetoreceptor?

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; T Yoshii; C Helfrich-Foerster; Margaret Ahmad
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-01

2.  Magnetic field perception in the rainbow trout Oncorynchus mykiss: magnetite mediated, light dependent or both?

Authors:  Jens Hellinger; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Magnetic compass of birds is based on a molecule with optimal directional sensitivity.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Roswitha Wiltschko; P J Hore; Christopher T Rodgers; Katrin Stapput; Peter Thalau; Christiane R Timmel; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Magnetoreception in birds: different physical processes for two types of directional responses.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Katrin Stapput; Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2007-03-21

5.  Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic alignment of ruminants.

Authors:  Hynek Burda; Sabine Begall; Jaroslav Cervený; Julia Neef; Pavel Nemec
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Avian magnetic compass can be tuned to anomalously low magnetic intensities.

Authors:  Michael Winklhofer; Evelyn Dylda; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Magnetic-field effect on the photoactivation reaction of Escherichia coli DNA photolyase.

Authors:  Kevin B Henbest; Kiminori Maeda; P J Hore; Monika Joshi; Adelbert Bacher; Robert Bittl; Stefan Weber; Christiane R Timmel; Erik Schleicher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Light alters nociceptive effects of magnetic field shielding in mice: intensity and wavelength considerations.

Authors:  Frank S Prato; Dawn Desjardins-Holmes; Lynn D Keenliside; Julia C McKay; John A Robertson; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Photoreceptor-based magnetoreception: optimal design of receptor molecules, cells, and neuronal processing.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Margaret Ahmad; Henrik Mouritsen; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Directional preference may enhance hunting accuracy in foraging foxes.

Authors:  Jaroslav Červený; Sabine Begall; Petr Koubek; Petra Nováková; Hynek Burda
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.