Literature DB >> 16849100

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Kai-Chun Cheng1, Wen-Chuan Wu.   

Abstract

We designed a case series study to evaluate the outcome of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). The prospective comparative nonrandomized clinical interventional study included 27 patients (27 eyes) with macular edema due to BRVO. The study group consisted of 16 patients who had accepted an intravitreal injection (IVI) of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. The control group included 11 patients without IVI of triamcinolone acetonide. The mean follow-up was 103.00 +/- 36.24 days in the study group and 94.55 +/- 36.31 days in the control group. In the study group, visual acuity measurements improved significantly (p < 0.001) from 0.77 +/- 0.43 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) preoperatively to a best postoperative visual acuity of 0.44 +/- 0.43 logMAR. Fourteen eyes (87.5%) gained improvement in visual acuity, with 10 eyes (62.5%) showing an increase in visual acuity of at least two Snellen lines. All 16 patients showed significant macular edema resolution in optical coherence tomography examination (p < 0.001) and perivascular leakage decrease in fluorescein angiography post-IVI. In the control group, baseline best-corrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity during the follow-up did not vary significantly (p = 0.294). In conclusion, IVI of triamcinolone acetonide can lead to an increase in visual acuity and a resolution of macular edema in patients with BRVO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16849100     DOI: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70318-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci        ISSN: 1607-551X            Impact factor:   2.744


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of retinal thickness values and segmentation performance of different OCT devices in acute branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  G Matt; S Sacu; W Buehl; C Ahlers; R Dunavoelgyi; C Pruente; U Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Three intravitreal bevacizumab versus two intravitreal triamcinolone injections in recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Alireza Ramezani; Hamed Esfandiari; Morteza Entezari; Siamak Moradian; Masoud Soheilian; Babak Dehsarvi; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care to treat vision loss associated with macular Edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) study report 6.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Michael S Ip; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Barbara A Blodi; Marian Fisher; Clement K Chan; Victor H Gonzalez; Lawrence J Singerman; Michael Tolentino
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09

4.  Comparison between intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Jin Young Kim; Sung Pyo Park
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-04

Review 5.  Branch retinal vein occlusion: pathogenesis, visual prognosis, and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Jiri Rehak; Matus Rehak
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  The comparison of intravitreal triamcinolone and bevacizumab in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Gokcen Gokce; Gungor Sobaci; Ali Hakan Durukan; Fazil Cuneyt Erdurman
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.