Literature DB >> 16848134

Comparative analysis of medical web search using generalized vs. niche technologies.

Daniel Lorence1, Joanna Abraham.   

Abstract

One increasingly popular solution to the problem of information overload is the niche search engine, designed as a customized knowledge management tool to meet the needs of information seekers with similar interests. By limiting web crawling to a specific subject area, the niche engine is able to crawl deeper and more discreetly than commercial counterparts. This exploratory technology assessment study sought to examine differences in information search and retrieval patterns between commercial and niche search engines in areas of debated or uncertain healthcarer treatment. Findings suggest that while information found within the niche search is generally more trustworthy, niche searches leave out many reliable sources which are retrievable through commercial search engines. Also, consumer-friendly (non-technical) resources were found to be more prevalent using commercial search engines, suggesting greater relevance for the layperson within this domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16848134     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-005-7990-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.920


  16 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet.

Authors:  Anthony G Crocco; Miguel Villasis-Keever; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Repetitive stress injury: diagnosis or self-fulfilling prophecy?

Authors:  R M Szabo; K J King
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board.

Authors:  J D Culver; F Gerr; H Frumkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States.

Authors:  R C Lawrence; C G Helmick; F C Arnett; R A Deyo; D T Felson; E H Giannini; S P Heyse; R Hirsch; M C Hochberg; G G Hunder; M H Liang; S R Pillemer; V D Steen; F Wolfe
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-05

Review 5.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?

Authors:  A R Jadad; A Gagliardi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.

Authors:  W M Silberg; G D Lundberg; R A Musacchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Internet-based medical information: time to take charge.

Authors:  J W Goldwein; I Benjamin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Patients, physicians, and the Internet.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Participation as an expression of patient uncertainty: an exploration of bowel cancer consultations.

Authors:  Tom Sanders; Suzanne Skevington
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Setting the public agenda for online health search: a white paper and action agenda.

Authors:  Liza Greenberg; Guy D'Andrea; Dan Lorence
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.