Literature DB >> 16846918

Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games.

Bram Van den Bergh1, Siegfried Dewitte.   

Abstract

Three experimental studies demonstrate that 'sex-related cues' impact human decision-making in ultimatum games. In the ultimatum game, two individuals divide a sum of money. The proposer offers a portion of the money to the other player, the responder. If the responder accepts the offer, the money is distributed in agreement with the proposer's offer. If the responder rejects the offer, neither player receives anything. Our studies show that exposure to pictures of sexy women or lingerie increases the likelihood of accepting unfair offers. Digit ratios of responders are reliably associated with their behaviour: males with lower digit ratios are more likely to reject an unfair split in neutral contexts, but more likely to accept unfair offers in sex-related contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846918      PMCID: PMC1635480          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  The ratio of second to fourth digit length in azoospermic males undergoing surgical sperm retrieval: predictive value for sperm retrieval and on wubsequent fertilization and pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Simon Wood; Ellen Vang; John Manning; Julie Walton; Steven Troup; Charles Kingsland; Iwan David Lewis-Jones
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  Finger-length ratios show evidence of prenatal hormone-transfer between opposite-sex twins.

Authors:  Sari M van Anders; Philip A Vernon; Christopher J Wilbur
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D) and number of sex partners: evidence for effects of prenatal testosterone in men.

Authors:  Johannes Hönekopp; Martin Voracek; John T Manning
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. evidence for sexually antagonistic genes?

Authors: 
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 4.178

5.  Short-term effects of copulation, human chorionic gonadotrophin injection and non-tactile association with a female on testosterone levels in the male rat.

Authors:  K Purvis; N B Haynes
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 6.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Changes in saliva testosterone after psychological stimulation in men.

Authors:  D H Hellhammer; W Hubert; T Schürmeyer
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.905

8.  Relative digit lengths predict men's behavior and attractiveness during social interactions with women.

Authors:  James R Roney; Dario Maestripieri
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2004-09

9.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?

Authors:  Margo Wilson; Martin Daly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Monkeys reject unequal pay.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  23 in total

1.  Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders.

Authors:  John M Coates; Mark Gurnell; Aldo Rustichini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Male risk taking, female odors, and the role of estrogen receptors.

Authors:  Martin Kavaliers; Amy Clipperton-Allen; Cheryl L Cragg; Jan-Åke Gustafsson; Kenneth S Korach; Louis Muglia; Elena Choleris
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-27

Review 3.  From molecule to market: steroid hormones and financial risk-taking.

Authors:  John M Coates; Mark Gurnell; Zoltan Sarnyai
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Digit ratio (2D : 4D) and prosocial behaviour in economic games: no direct correlation with generosity, bargaining or trust-related behaviours.

Authors:  Pablo Brañas-Garza; Antonio M Espín; Teresa García-Muñoz; Jaromír Kovářík
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Digit ratios (2D:4D) determined by computer-assisted analysis are more reliable than those using physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scans.

Authors:  Heather C Allaway; Terri G Bloski; Roger A Pierson; Marla E Lujan
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.937

6.  Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity.

Authors:  Nicholas Pound; Ian S Penton-Voak; Alison K Surridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Estrogen receptors alpha and beta mediate different aspects of the facilitatory effects of female cues on male risk taking.

Authors:  Martin Kavaliers; Nino Devidze; Elena Choleris; Melissa Fudge; Jan-Ake Gustafsson; Kenneth S Korach; Donald W Pfaff; Sonoko Ogawa
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.905

8.  Empathy moderates the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on costly punishment.

Authors:  Martin Brüne; Dirk Scheele; Christine Heinisch; Cumhur Tas; Julia Wischniewski; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Experimental subjects are not different.

Authors:  Filippos Exadaktylos; Antonio M Espín; Pablo Brañas-Garza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A putative human pheromone, androstadienone, increases cooperation between men.

Authors:  Paavo Huoviala; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.