Literature DB >> 16845535

Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae.

Kellar Autumn1, Wendy Hansen.   

Abstract

Geckos may represent the world's most demanding adhesives application. The adhesive setae on the toes of climbing geckos must adhere strongly yet avoid fouling or attachment at inappropriate times. We tested the hypothesis that gecko setae are non-adhesive in their unloaded default state by comparing the water droplet contact angle (theta) of isolated setal arrays to the smooth surface of eye spectacle scales of tokay geckos (Gekko gecko). At equilibrium, theta was 98.3 +/- 3.4 degrees in spectacle scales of live geckos and 93.3 +/- 3.5 degrees in isolated spectacles. Isolated setal arrays were ultrahydrophobic, with theta of 160.6 +/- 1.3 degrees (means +/- SD). The difference in theta of setal arrays and smooth spectacles indicates a very low contact fraction. Using Cassie's law of surface wettability, we infer that less than 6.6% of the surface of unloaded setae is solid and at least 93.4% is air space. We calculated that the contact fraction must increase from 6.6% in the unloaded state to 46% in the loaded state to account for previously measured values of adhesion. Thus gecko setae may be non-sticky by default because only a very small contact fraction is possible without mechanically deforming the setal array.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16845535     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-006-0149-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  17 in total

1.  Mimicking the lotus effect: influence of double roughness structures and slender pillars.

Authors:  Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 3.882

2.  Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae.

Authors:  W R Hansen; K Autumn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dynamics of geckos running vertically.

Authors:  K Autumn; S T Hsieh; D M Dudek; J Chen; C Chitaphan; R J Full
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Adhesion design maps for bio-inspired attachment systems.

Authors:  Ralph Spolenak; Stanislav Gorb; Eduard Arzt
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  On the nature of surface roughness with application to contact mechanics, sealing, rubber friction and adhesion.

Authors:  B N J Persson; O Albohr; U Tartaglino; A I Volokitin; E Tosatti
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 2.333

6.  Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos.

Authors:  Kellar Autumn; Anne M Peattie
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  The molecular structure of reptilian keratin.

Authors:  R D Fraser; D A Parry
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.953

8.  The structure of the digital setae of lizards.

Authors:  R Ruibal; V Ernst
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 1.804

9.  Biophysics: water-repellent legs of water striders.

Authors:  Xuefeng Gao; Lei Jiang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Young's modulus of feather keratin

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  26 in total

1.  Dynamic self-cleaning in gecko setae via digital hyperextension.

Authors:  Shihao Hu; Stephanie Lopez; Peter H Niewiarowski; Zhenhai Xia
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Ancestrally high elastic modulus of gecko setal beta-keratin.

Authors:  Anne M Peattie; Carmel Majidi; Andrew Corder; Robert J Full
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Pushing versus pulling: division of labour between tarsal attachment pads in cockroaches.

Authors:  Christofer J Clemente; Walter Federle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive.

Authors:  Alborz Mahdavi; Lino Ferreira; Cathryn Sundback; Jason W Nichol; Edwin P Chan; David J D Carter; Chris J Bettinger; Siamrut Patanavanich; Loice Chignozha; Eli Ben-Joseph; Alex Galakatos; Howard Pryor; Irina Pomerantseva; Peter T Masiakos; William Faquin; Andreas Zumbuehl; Seungpyo Hong; Jeffrey Borenstein; Joseph Vacanti; Robert Langer; Jeffrey M Karp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. II. Microscale behaviour.

Authors:  Bryan Schubert; Jongho Lee; Carmel Majidi; Ronald S Fearing
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Macroscale behaviour.

Authors:  Jongho Lee; Carmel Majidi; Bryan Schubert; Ronald S Fearing
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment.

Authors:  Nick Gravish; Matt Wilkinson; Kellar Autumn
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Orientation angle and the adhesion of single gecko setae.

Authors:  Ginel C Hill; Daniel R Soto; Anne M Peattie; Robert J Full; T W Kenny
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae.

Authors:  James M R Bullock; Walter Federle
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-04-05

10.  Direct evidence of phospholipids in gecko footprints and spatula-substrate contact interface detected using surface-sensitive spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ping Yuan Hsu; Liehui Ge; Xiaopeng Li; Alyssa Y Stark; Chrys Wesdemiotis; Peter H Niewiarowski; Ali Dhinojwala
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.