Literature DB >> 16844268

Chapter 20: Issues in planning cervical cancer screening in the era of HPV vaccination.

Eduardo L Franco1, Jack Cuzick, Allan Hildesheim, Silvia de Sanjosé.   

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines will likely have an impact as a preventive strategy for cervical cancer. Screening for precancerous lesions cannot be discontinued because vaccination will not protect against HPV types not included in the first generation of vaccines. Moreover, protection for the target types, 16 and 18, which are responsible for most cases of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer, and 6 and 11, which are responsible for a substantial proportion of low-grade lesions, cannot be expected to be absolute, and the likely implementation of HPV vaccination in young women will not impact older groups initially. Cervical cancer control programs will need to be re-evaluated because the addition of HPV vaccination will make the existing approach of high-frequency screening by cytology too costly and inefficient for most public health budgets. Simply making cytology screening less frequent may not be a viable strategy in light of potential problems that may plague cytology performance in conditions of low lesion prevalence. HPV testing has the performance characteristics that would make it an ideal primary screening test in such conditions. Cytology should be reserved for triage of HPV-positive cases because it is more likely to perform with sufficient accuracy in high-prevalence conditions. Another advantage of using HPV testing as a primary screening tool is the opportunity to create infection registries that can link test results from the same women over time, thus allowing an efficient and low-cost strategy to monitor long-term protection among vaccinated women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16844268     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  60 in total

1.  Immunization in Canada: a 6-year update.

Authors:  Scott A Halperin; Kiersten Pianosi
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2010-06

2.  Vaccination against human papillomavirus.

Authors:  Eduardo L Franco; Alexandra de Pokomandy; Andrea R Spence; Ann N Burchell; Helen Trottier; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Susie Lau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Commentary: Health inequity could increase in poor countries if universal HPV vaccination is not adopted.

Authors:  Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-25

4.  The human papillomavirus vaccine: The promise of cervical cancer prevention.

Authors:  Bl Johnston; Jm Conly
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Trade-offs in cervical cancer prevention: balancing benefits and risks.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Jesse D Ortendahl; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-22

6.  "Drivers" of translational cancer epidemiology in the 21st century: needs and opportunities.

Authors:  Tram Kim Lam; Margaret Spitz; Sheri D Schully; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Immunoprevention of human papillomavirus-associated malignancies.

Authors:  Joshua W Wang; Chein-Fu Hung; Warner K Huh; Cornelia L Trimble; Richard B S Roden
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-12-08

8.  Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Richardson; Joseph Tota; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05

9.  Cost effectiveness analysis of including boys in a human papillomavirus vaccination programme in the United States.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-08

10.  Human papillomavirus testing with Pap triage for cervical cancer prevention in Canada: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Shalini L Kulasingam; Raghu Rajan; Yvan St Pierre; C Victoria Atwood; Evan R Myers; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.