Literature DB >> 16841623

Bupropion extended release compared with escitalopram: effects on sexual functioning and antidepressant efficacy in 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Anita H Clayton1, Harry A Croft, Joseph P Horrigan, Donna S Wightman, Alok Krishen, Nathalie E Richard, Jack G Modell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects on sexual functioning and the antidepressant efficacy of once-daily bupropion extended release (XL) and escitalopram in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD).
METHOD: Adult outpatients with moderate to severe DSM-IV-defined MDD and normal sexual functioning were randomly assigned to receive bupropion XL (300-450 mg/day; N = 276), escitalopram (10-20 mg/day; N = 281), or placebo (N = 273) for up to 8 weeks in 2 identically designed, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies (study 1 conducted from February 6, 2003, to June 10, 2004; study 2 conducted from January 21, 2003, to June 15, 2004). Data were analyzed prospectively for each study individually, and pooled data were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: In both the individual studies and the pooled dataset, the incidence of orgasm dysfunction at week 8 (primary endpoint) and the incidence of worsened sexual functioning at the end of the treatment period were statistically significantly lower with bupropion XL than with escitalopram (p < .05), not statistically different between bupropion XL and placebo (p > or = .067), and statistically significantly higher with escitalopram than with placebo (p < or = .001). The percentages of patients with orgasm dysfunction at week 8 in study 1, study 2, and the pooled dataset, respectively, were 13%, 16%, and 15% with bupropion XL; 32%, 29%, and 30% with escitalopram; and 11%, 8%, and 9% with placebo. The respective percentages of patients with worsened sexual functioning at the end of the treatment period were 18%, 22%, and 20% with bupropion XL; 37%, 34%, and 36% with escitalopram; and 14%, 16%, and 15% with placebo. Mean changes in Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire scores for all domains at week 8 were statistically significantly worse for escitalopram compared with bupropion XL (p < or = .05). Separation from placebo could not be established at a statistical .05 level for bupropion on 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score. However, escitalopram showed statistical superiority to placebo on HAM-D-17 total score in one of the 2 studies and in the pooled data. Bupropion XL did not statistically differ from escitalopram with respect to mean change in HAM-D-17 total score, HAM-D-17 response or remission rates, percentage of patients much or very much improved on Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale scores, or mean changes in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale total score or Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale score at week 8.
CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion XL had a sexual tolerability profile significantly better than that of escitalopram with similar HAM-D-17 remission rates and HAD total scores in patients with MDD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16841623     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  26 in total

Review 1.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Juan Undurraga; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  How should primary care doctors select which antidepressants to administer?

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Kylie Thaler; Seth Hill; Richard A Hansen
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  The efficacy and tolerability of bupropion in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Ricardo Moreira
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Sexual dysfunction associated with second-generation antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ursula Reichenpfader; Gerald Gartlehner; Laura C Morgan; Amy Greenblatt; Barbara Nussbaumer; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Delayed orgasm and anorgasmia.

Authors:  Lawrence C Jenkins; John P Mulhall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Results of a proof-of-concept, dose-finding, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of RX-10100 (Serdaxin®) in subjects with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Robert Riesenberg; Joshua Rosenthal; Leslie Moldauer; Christine Peterson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Pharmacogenomics in the treatment of mood disorders: Strategies and Opportunities for personalized psychiatry.

Authors:  Azmeraw T Amare; Klaus Oliver Schubert; Bernhard T Baune
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 8.  A biopsychosocial approach to women's sexual function and dysfunction at midlife: A narrative review.

Authors:  Holly N Thomas; Rebecca C Thurston
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Population Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Extended-Release Bupropion and Its Three Metabolites in Chinese Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Yan Li; Jingqiu Hu; Jinhua Zhong; Huafang Li
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 10.  Spotlight on bupropion in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon; Lily P H Yang; Monique P Curran
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.