Literature DB >> 16836043

Learning the moves: the effect of familiarity and facial motion on person recognition across large changes in viewing format.

Dana A Roark1, Alice J O'Toole, Hervé Abdi, Susan E Barrett.   

Abstract

Familiarity with a face or person can support recognition in tasks that require generalization to novel viewing contexts. Using naturalistic viewing conditions requiring recognition of people from face or whole body gait stimuli, we investigated the effects of familiarity, facial motion, and direction of learning/test transfer on person recognition. Participants were familiarized with previously unknown people from gait videos and were tested on faces (experiment 1a) or were familiarized with faces and were tested with gait videos (experiment 1b). Recognition was more accurate when learning from the face and testing with the gait videos, than when learning from the gait videos and testing with the face. The repetition of a single stimulus, either the face or gait, produced strong recognition gains across transfer conditions. Also, the presentation of moving faces resulted in better performance than that of static faces. In experiment 2, we investigated the role of facial motion further by testing recognition with static profile images. Motion provided no benefit for recognition, indicating that structure-from-motion is an unlikely source of the motion advantage found in the first set of experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16836043     DOI: 10.1068/p5503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

Review 1.  A multilevel Bayesian meta-analysis of the body inversion effect: Evaluating controversies over headless and sexualized bodies.

Authors:  Jason W Griffin; Flora Oswald
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  Dynamic and static facial expressions decoded from motion-sensitive areas in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Nicholas Furl; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Ning Liu; Bruno B Averbeck; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Exemplar variance supports robust learning of facial identity.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Alberta Ipser; Sebastian B Gaigg; Richard Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of exposure to facial expression variation in face learning and recognition.

Authors:  Chang Hong Liu; Wenfeng Chen; James Ward
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-15

5.  Dynamic Emotional Faces Generalise Better to a New Expression but not to a New View.

Authors:  Chang Hong Liu; Wenfeng Chen; James Ward; Nozomi Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Anterior superior temporal sulcus is specialized for non-rigid facial motion in both monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Shruti Japee; Andrea Stacy; Molly Flessert; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Trainability of novel person recognition based on brief exposure to form and motion cues.

Authors:  Kylie Ann Steel; Rachel A Robbins; Patti Nijhuis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-28

Review 8.  On the facilitative effects of face motion on face recognition and its development.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Steve Perrotta; Paul C Quinn; Zhe Wang; Yu-Hao P Sun; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24

9.  Individual differences in eyewitness accuracy across multiple lineups of faces.

Authors:  Andrew J Russ; Melanie Sauerland; Charlotte E Lee; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-08-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.