Literature DB >> 16835365

Temporal analysis of the flow from V1 to the extrastriate cortex in humans.

Koji Inui1, Ryusuke Kakigi.   

Abstract

We previously examined the cortical processing in response to somatosensory, auditory and noxious stimuli, using magnetoencephalography in humans. Here, we performed a similar analysis of the processing in the human visual cortex for comparative purposes. After flash stimuli applied to the right eye, activations were found in eight cortical areas: the left medial occipital area around the calcarine fissure (primary visual cortex, V1), the left dorsomedial area around the parietooccipital sulcus (DM), the ventral (MOv) and dorsal (MOd) parts of the middle occipital area of bilateral hemispheres, the left temporo-occipito-parietal cortex corresponding to human MT/V5 (hMT), and the ventral surface of the medial occipital area (VO) of the bilateral hemispheres. The mean onset latencies of each cortical activity were (in ms): 27.5 (V1), 31.8 (DM), 32.8 (left MOv), 32.2 (right MOv), 33.4 (left MOd), 32.3 (right MOv), 37.8 (hMT), 46.9 (left VO), and 46.4 (right VO). Therefore the cortico-cortical connection time of visual processing at the early stage was 4-6 ms, which is very similar to the time delay between sequential activations in somatosensory and auditory processing. In addition, the activities in V1, MOd, DM, and hMT showed a similar biphasic waveform with a reversal of polarity after 10 ms, which is a common activation profile of the cortical activity for somatosensory, auditory, and pain-evoked responses. These results suggest similar mechanisms of the serial cortico-cortical processing of sensory information among all sensory areas of the cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835365     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00103.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Can illusory deviant stimuli be used as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddball paradigm?

Authors:  Maria Flynn; Alki Liasis; Mark Gardner; Stewart Boyd; Tony Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural processes for intentional control of perceptual switching: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Masanori Shimono; Keiichi Kitajo; Tsunehiro Takeda
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Submillisecond unmasked subliminal visual stimuli evoke electrical brain responses.

Authors:  Holger F Sperdin; Lucas Spierer; Robert Becker; Christoph M Michel; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effects of spatial frequency on visual evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Aki Tsuruhara; Yuko Nagata; Masaya Suzuki; Koji Inui; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modeling the effect of dendritic input location on MEG and EEG source dipoles.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Christopher Wreh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Direction of magnetoencephalography sources associated with feedback and feedforward contributions in a visual object recognition task.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Stephanie R Jones; Jyrki Ahveninen; Matti S Hämäläinen; John W Belliveau; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Echoic memory of a single pure tone indexed by change-related brain activity.

Authors:  Koji Inui; Tomokazu Urakawa; Koya Yamashiro; Naofumi Otsuru; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Makoto Nishihara; Eishi Motomura; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Stimulus-contrast-induced biases in activation order reveal interaction between V1/V2 and human MT+.

Authors:  Masaki Maruyama; Daniel D Palomo; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  TMS disruption of V5/MT+ indicates a role for the dorsal stream in word recognition.

Authors:  Robin Laycock; David P Crewther; Paul B Fitzgerald; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Human posterior parietal cortex responds to visual stimuli as early as peristriate occipital cortex.

Authors:  Tamar I Regev; Jonathan Winawer; Edden M Gerber; Robert T Knight; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.