Literature DB >> 16835331

Mammographic density correlation with Gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors.

Melanie R Palomares1, Joelle R B Machia, Constance D Lehman, Janet R Daling, Anne McTiernan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Gail model is a validated breast cancer risk assessment tool that is primarily based on nonmodifiable breast cancer risk factors. Conversely, mammographic breast density is strongly correlated with breast cancer risk and responds to risk-modifying interventions. The purpose of our study was to correlate mammographic density with breast cancer risk as calculated by the Gail model and to examine the relative association of each of the model covariates to mammographic density.
METHODS: The study included 99 participants of the National Surgical Breast and Bowel Project P-1 trial, ages 36 to 74 years, all of whom had a mammogram and Gail model risk estimates done upon trial entry. Baseline mammograms were retrieved and digitized, and mammographic density was assessed by both subjective and computer-assisted objective measures.
RESULTS: Mammographic density was 2-fold higher in women with a >15% lifetime risk of breast cancer compared with those with <15% risk, by all density assessment methods. This was equivalent to a 3% to 6% increase in density per 10% increase in risk. Gail model covariates that measured benign or premalignant breast tissue changes accounted for the majority (41%) of the relationship with increased mammographic density. Seven percent of density was not explained by risk factors included in the Gail model.
CONCLUSIONS: The Gail model does not fully account for the association between breast density and calculated breast cancer risk. Because mammographic density is a modifiable marker, development of a breast cancer risk assessment tool that includes mammographic density could be beneficial for assessing individual risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835331     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  13 in total

1.  Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI.

Authors:  Hui Li; William A Weiss; Milica Medved; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-28

Review 2.  Research in digital mammography and tomosynthesis at the University of Toronto.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-06-25

Review 3.  Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis--a systematic review.

Authors:  E U Ekpo; M F McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Stiff stroma increases breast cancer risk by inducing the oncogene ZNF217.

Authors:  Jason J Northey; Alexander S Barrett; Irene Acerbi; Mary-Kate Hayward; Stephanie Talamantes; Ivory S Dean; Janna K Mouw; Suzanne M Ponik; Jonathon N Lakins; Po-Jui Huang; Junmin Wu; Quanming Shi; Susan Samson; Patricia J Keely; Rita A Mukhtar; Jan T Liphardt; John A Shepherd; E Shelley Hwang; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kirk C Hansen; Laurie E Littlepage; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Breast tenderness after initiation of conjugated equine estrogens and mammographic density change.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Aaron K Aragaki; Jane A Cauley; Anne McTiernan; Joann E Manson; Garnet L Anderson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Rowan T Chlebowski
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Circulating levels of inflammatory markers and mammographic density among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Joel L Weissfeld; Francesmary Modugno; Brenda Diergaarde
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Predrag R Bakic; Ann-Katherine Carton; Andrea B Troxel; Emily F Conant; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  A case-control study on risk factors of breast cancer in China.

Authors:  Ya-Li Xu; Qiang Sun; Guang-Liang Shan; Jin Zhang; Hai-Bo Liao; Shi-Yong Li; Jun Jiang; Zhi-Min Shao; Hong-Chuan Jiang; Nian-Chun Shen; Yue Shi; Cheng-Ze Yu; Bao-Ning Zhang; Yan-Hua Chen; Xue-Ning Duan; Bo Li
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  A Randomized Phase IIb Study of Low-dose Tamoxifen in Chest-irradiated Cancer Survivors at Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia; Melanie R Palomares; Lindsey Hageman; Yanjun Chen; Wendy Landier; Kandice Smith; Heidi Umphrey; Caroline A Reich; Kathryn W Zamora; Saro H Armenian; Therese B Bevers; Anne Blaes; Tara Henderson; David Hodgson; Melissa M Hudson; Larissa A Korde; Susan A Melin; Sofia D Merajver; Linda Overholser; Sandhya Pruthi; F Lennie Wong; Judy E Garber
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.