Literature DB >> 16834318

Model identity SN2 reactions CH3X + X- (X = F, Cl, CN, OH, SH, NH2, PH2): Marcus theory analyzed.

Jason M Gonzales1, Wesley D Allen, Henry F Schaefer.   

Abstract

The structures of seven gas phase identity S(N)2 reactions of the form CH(3)X + X(-) have been characterized with seven distinct theoretical methods: RHF, B3LYP, BLYP, BP86, MP2, CCSD, and CCSD(T), in conjunction with basis sets of double and triple zeta quality. Additionally, the energetics of said reactions have been definitively computed using focal point analyses utilizing extrapolation to the one-particle limit for the Hartree-Fock and MP2 energies using basis sets of up to aug-cc-pV5Z quality, inclusion of higher order correlation effects [CCSD and CCSD(T)] with basis sets of aug-cc-pVTZ quality, and additional auxiliary terms for core correlation and scalar relativistic effects. Final net activation barriers for the reactions are E(b)(F,F)= -0.8, E(b)(Cl,Cl)= 1.6, E(b)(CN,CN)= 28.7, E(b)(OH,OH)= 14.3, E(b)(SH,SH)= 13.8, E(b)(NH2,NH2)= 28.6, and E(b)(PH2,PH2)= 25.7 kcal mol(-1). General trends in the energetics, specifically the performance of the density functionals, and the component energies of the focal point analyses are discussed. The utility of classic Marcus theory as a technique for barrier predictions has been carefully analyzed. The standard Marcus theory results show disparities of up to 9 kcal mol(-1) with respect to explicitly computed results. However, when alternative approaches to Marcus theory, independent of the well-depths, are considered, excellent performance is achieved, with the largest deviations being under 3 kcal mol(-1).

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16834318     DOI: 10.1021/jp054734f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  7 in total

1.  Selectivity of labeled bromoethylamine for protein alkylation.

Authors:  Simona Marincean; Montserrat Rabago Smith; Laci Beltz; Babak Borhan
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  QM/MM Calculations for the Cl- + CH3Cl SN2 Reaction in Water Using CM5 Charges and Density Functional Theory.

Authors:  Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Activation Strain Analysis of SN2 Reactions at C, N, O, and F Centers.

Authors:  Jan Kubelka; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  An interacting quantum atom study of model SN 2 reactions (X- ···CH3 X, X = F, Cl, Br, and I).

Authors:  Ibon Alkorta; Joseph C R Thacker; Paul L A Popelier
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Pericyclic reaction benchmarks: hierarchical computations targeting CCSDT(Q)/CBS and analysis of DFT performance.

Authors:  Pascal Vermeeren; Marco Dalla Tiezza; Mark E Wolf; Mitchell E Lahm; Wesley D Allen; Henry F Schaefer; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.945

6.  Competition between N and O: use of diazine N-oxides as a test case for the Marcus theory rationale for ambident reactivity.

Authors:  Kevin J Sheehy; Lorraine M Bateman; Niko T Flosbach; Martin Breugst; Peter A Byrne
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 7.  Nucleophilic Substitution (SN 2): Dependence on Nucleophile, Leaving Group, Central Atom, Substituents, and Solvent.

Authors:  Trevor A Hamlin; Marcel Swart; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.