Literature DB >> 16832873

An evaluation of the replicate pool method: quick estimation of genome-wide linkage peak p-values.

Janis E Wigginton1, Gonçalo R Abecasis.   

Abstract

The calculation of empirical p-values for genome-wide non-parametric linkage tests continues to present significant computational challenges for many complex disease mapping studies. The gold standard approach is to use gene dropping to simulate null genome scans. Unfortunately, this approach is too computationally expensive for many data sets of interest. An alternative, more efficient method for sampling null genome scans is to pre-calculate pools of family-specific statistics and then resample from these replicate pools to generate "pseudo-replicate" genome scans. In this study, we use simulations to explore properties of the replicate pool p-value estimator pRP and show that it provides an excellent approximation to the traditional gene-dropping estimator for significantly less computational effort. While the computational efficiency of the replicate pool estimator is noticeable in almost all data sets, by applying the replicate pool method to several previously characterized data sets we show that savings in computational effort can be especially significant (on the order of 10,000-fold or more) when one or more large families are analyzed. We also estimate replicate pool p-values for the schizophrenia data described by Abecasis et al. and show that pRP closely approximates gene-drop p-values for all linkage peaks reported for this study. Lastly, we expand upon Song et al.'s previous work by deriving a conservative estimator of the variance for PRP that can easily be computed in practical settings. We have implemented the replicate pool method along with our variance estimator in a new program called Pseudo, which is the first widely available automated implementation of the replicate pool method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16832873     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  4 in total

1.  Unifying ideas for non-parametric linkage analysis.

Authors:  Aaron G Day-Williams; John Blangero; Thomas D Dyer; Kenneth Lange; Eric M Sobel
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Evidence of linkage to chromosomes 10p15.3-p15.1, 14q24.3-q31.1 and 9q33.3-q34.3 in non-syndromic colorectal cancer families.

Authors:  Ian W Saunders; Jason Ross; Finlay Macrae; Graeme P Young; Ignacio Blanco; Jesper Brohede; Glenn Brown; Diana Brookes; Trevor Lockett; Peter L Molloy; Victor Moreno; Gabriel Capella; Garry N Hannan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Efficient calculation of empirical P-values for genome-wide linkage analysis through weighted permutation.

Authors:  Sarah E Medland; James E Schmitt; Bradley T Webb; Po-Hsiu Kuo; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Novel caries loci in children and adults implicated by genome-wide analysis of families.

Authors:  Manika Govil; Nandita Mukhopadhyay; Daniel E Weeks; Eleanor Feingold; John R Shaffer; Steven M Levy; Alexandre R Vieira; Rebecca L Slayton; Daniel W McNeil; Robert J Weyant; Richard J Crout; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.