Literature DB >> 16832002

Evaluation and treatment of pharyngitis in primary care practice: the difference between guidelines is largely academic.

Jeffrey A Linder1, Joseph C Chan, David W Bates.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The guidelines from the American College of Physicians and the Infectious Diseases Society of America differ with respect to the use of clinical criteria and microbiologic testing to identify adults with pharyngitis who are likely to have group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.
METHODS: To measure the rate of adherence to 3 strategies, we performed a retrospective analysis of visits to Boston, Mass, area primary care clinics by adults with a diagnosis of pharyngitis (n = 2097).
RESULTS: The 4-point Centor criteria recommended by the American College of Physicians and Infectious Diseases Society of America were not predictive of streptococcal testing (results for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 criteria were 79%, 81%, 79%, 80%, and 74%, respectively; P = .63) but were predictive of a positive streptococcal test (8%, 13%, 22%, 31%, and 30%, respectively; P<.001) and of antibiotic prescribing (25%, 34%, 63%, 80%, and 89%, respectively; P<.001). Clinicians were adherent to the American College of Physicians' empirical strategy in 12% of visits, the American College of Physicians' test strategy in 30% of visits, the Infectious Diseases Society of America's strategy in 30% of visits, and adherent to none of these strategies in 66% of visits. The most common reason for nonadherence to any strategy was testing or antibiotic prescribing to patients at low risk of streptococcal pharyngitis (1076 visits; 78% of the visits in which physicians were nonadherent to any strategy), patients for whom the guidelines agree.
CONCLUSIONS: The major problem in the testing and treatment of adults with pharyngitis is not which guideline to follow, but that clinicians usually fail to follow any guideline. Interventions should focus on an area where the guidelines agree: avoiding testing and antibiotic prescribing to patients at low risk for streptococcal pharyngitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16832002     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.13.1374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  22 in total

Review 1.  Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Patient-specific academic detailing for smoking cessation: feasibility study.

Authors:  Margaret Jin; Antony Gagnon; Mitchell Levine; Lehana Thabane; Christine Rodriguez; Lisa Dolovich
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Antimicrobial prescribing in the USA for adult acute pharyngitis in relation to treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Steven Y Hong; Ying Taur; Michael R Jordan; Christine Wanke
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Differences among international pharyngitis guidelines: not just academic.

Authors:  Jan Matthys; Marc De Meyere; Mieke L van Driel; An De Sutter
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Large-scale validation of the Centor and McIsaac scores to predict group A streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  Andrew M Fine; Victor Nizet; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-11

7.  Predicting streptococcal pharyngitis in adults in primary care: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs and validation of the Centor score.

Authors:  Jolien Aalbers; Kirsty K O'Brien; Wai-Sun Chan; Gavin A Falk; Conor Teljeur; Borislav D Dimitrov; Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 8.  Pharyngitis management: defining the controversy.

Authors:  Robert Maccabee Centor; Jeroan Julius Allison; Stuart James Cohen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Near-patient tests and the clinical gaze in decision-making of Swedish GPs not following current guidelines for sore throat - a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Hedvig Gröndal; Katarina Hedin; Eva Lena Strandberg; Malin André; Annika Brorsson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Do physician outcome judgments and judgment biases contribute to inappropriate use of treatments? Study protocol.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Roy Poses; Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Lott; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Elise Bassin; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.