| Literature DB >> 16831654 |
Hanns-Joachim Helling1, Axel Prokop, Hans Ulrich Schmid, Michael Nagel, Jürgen Lilienthal, Klaus Emil Rehm.
Abstract
This multicenter, prospective, randomized study compares the use of biodegradable polylactide pins with standard metal mini-fragment implants for the treatment of displaced radial head fractures. It compares complication rates and clinical outcomes of both treatment methods. At 2 years, 135 (82%) of 164 patients were available for evaluation. Equivalence of treatment method was defined as a difference of 10% or less in the number of complication-free patients. Functional status was assessed by using the Broberg and Morrey Elbow Score and compared by an unpaired t test. Good or excellent clinical results were achieved by 92% (56/61) of the control patients and 96% (71/74) of the polylactide patients. The incidence of complication-free patients was 3.7% less in the polylactide group than in the control group. The 1-sided 95% confidence interval for the treatment difference between the 2 groups was more than -6.1%. Biodegradable polylactide pins have at least comparable outcomes as standard metal implants for the internal fixation of reconstructable displaced radial head fractures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16831654 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg ISSN: 1058-2746 Impact factor: 3.019