Literature DB >> 16829619

Quantifying specific antibody concentrations by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using slope correction.

Roger W Barrette1, Jessica Urbonas, Lawrence K Silbart.   

Abstract

Assessing the magnitude of an antibody response is important to many research and clinical endeavors; however, there are considerable differences in the experimental approaches used to achieve this end. Although the time-honored approach of end point titration has merit, the titer can often be misleading due to differences in how it is calculated or when samples contain high concentrations of low-avidity antibodies. One frequently employed alternative is to adapt commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, designed to measure total antibody concentrations, to estimate antigen-specific antibody concentrations. This is accomplished by coating the specific antigen of interest in place of the capture antibody provided with the kit and then using the kit's standard curve to quantify the specific antibody concentration. This approach introduces considerable imprecision, due primarily to its reliance on a single sample dilution. This "single-point" approach fails to address differences in the slope of the sample titration curve compared to that of the standard curve. Here, we describe a general approach for estimating the effective concentration of specific antibodies, using antisera against foot-and-mouth disease virus VP1 peptide. This was accomplished by initially calculating the slope of the sample titration curve and then mathematically correcting the slope to that of a corresponding standard curve. A significantly higher degree of precision was attained using this approach rather than the single-point method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16829619      PMCID: PMC1489577          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00422-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  10 in total

1.  Neutralization of the biological activity of cytokines and other protein effectors by antibody: theoretical formulation of antibody titration curves in relation to antibody affinity.

Authors:  Yoshimi Kawade; Norman Finter; Sidney E Grossberg
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  A mathematical model of immunohistochemical preparations, which provides quantitative predictions.

Authors:  T Holland; H Holland
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Application of theoretical considerations to the analysis of ELISA data.

Authors:  J H Peterman; J E Butler
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 4.  Avidity of anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I antibodies.

Authors:  B Bozic; S Cucnik; T Kveder; B Rozman
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 9.754

5.  Measurement of monoclonal antibody affinity by non-competitive enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  J D Beatty; B G Beatty; W G Vlahos
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1987-06-26       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  The role of antibody concentration and avidity in antiviral protection.

Authors:  M F Bachmann; U Kalinke; A Althage; G Freer; C Burkhart; H Roost; M Aguet; H Hengartner; R M Zinkernagel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The indirect ELISA for quantitation of specific antibody: analysis of antibody dilution curves.

Authors:  K Sparks; M Ballow
Journal:  Diagn Immunol       Date:  1983

8.  Lymphoid hyperplasia resulting in immune dysregulation is caused by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection in neonatal pigs.

Authors:  Caitlin D Lemke; Joseph S Haynes; Rodger Spaete; Deb Adolphson; Ann Vorwald; Kelly Lager; John E Butler
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Evaluation of the immunoglobulin G avidity test for diagnosis of toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Jose G Montoya; Heather B Huffman; J S Remington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Effective synthetic peptide vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease in swine.

Authors:  Chang Yi Wang; Tseng Yuan Chang; Alan M Walfield; John Ye; Ming Shen; Shih Ping Chen; Ming Chang Li; Yeou Liang Lin; Ming Hwa Jong; Ping Cheng Yang; Nancy Chyr; Ed Kramer; Fred Brown
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 3.641

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Antibody response to Achromobacter xylosoxidans during HIV infection is associated with lower CD4 levels and increased lymphocyte activation.

Authors:  Erick T Tatro; Intan Purnajo; Douglas D Richman; Davey M Smith; Sara Gianella
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-10-30

2.  Proteomics-directed cloning of circulating antiviral human monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Shuji Sato; Sean A Beausoleil; Lana Popova; Jason G Beaudet; Ravi K Ramenani; Xiaowu Zhang; James S Wieler; Sandra M Schieferl; Wan Cheung Cheung; Roberto D Polakiewicz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Decreased antigenicity profiles of immune-escaped and drug-resistant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) double mutants.

Authors:  Mingshun Zhang; Guohong Ge; Yonglin Yang; Xubing Cai; Qiang Fu; Jie Cai; Zuhu Huang
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 4.099

4.  Type I interferon shapes the quantity and quality of the anti-Zika virus antibody response.

Authors:  Cheryl Yi-Pin Lee; Guillaume Carissimo; Zheyuan Chen; Fok-Moon Lum; Farhana Abu Bakar; Ravisankar Rajarethinam; Teck-Hui Teo; Anthony Torres-Ruesta; Laurent Renia; Lisa Fp Ng
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2020-04-26

5.  A Rapid Method for Direct Quantification of Antibody Binding-Site Concentration in Serum.

Authors:  Erwin G Abucayon; Connor Whalen; Oscar B Torres; Alexander J Duval; Agnieszka Sulima; Joshua F G Antoline; Therese Oertel; Rodell C Barrientos; Arthur E Jacobson; Kenner C Rice; Gary R Matyas
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Use of inactivated Escherichia coli enterotoxins to enhance respiratory mucosal adjuvanticity during vaccination in swine.

Authors:  Roger W Barrette; Steven M Szczepanek; Debra Rood; Sreerupa Challa; Naomi Avery; Michael Vajdy; Ed Kramer; Luis Rodriguez; Lawrence K Silbart
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-09-14

7.  Assessment of antigenic specificity of polyclonal antisera raised against Avibacterium paragallinarum by ELISA.

Authors:  Ajaz Ahmed; Sidhartha Deshmukh; Harmanjit Singh Banga; Sandeep Sodhi; Rajinder Singh Brar
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-16

8.  Progress toward a group B streptococcal vaccine.

Authors:  Joon Young Song; Jae Hyang Lim; Sangyong Lim; Zhi Yong; Ho Seong Seo
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Evolution of anti-modified protein antibody responses can be driven by consecutive exposure to different post-translational modifications.

Authors:  M Volkov; A S B Kampstra; K A van Schie; A Kawakami; M Tamai; S Kawashiri; T Maeda; T W J Huizinga; R E M Toes; D van der Woude
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.156

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.