Literature DB >> 1682879

The expression of murine Hox-2 genes is dependent on the differentiation pathway and displays a collinear sensitivity to retinoic acid in F9 cells and Xenopus embryos.

N Papalopulu1, R Lovell-Badge, R Krumlauf.   

Abstract

In this paper we describe experiments that detail the response of murine Hox-2 genes to cellular differentiation and retinoic acid in cell culture. Hox-2 genes are transiently activated in differentiating ES cells even in the absence of retinoic acid (RA), indicating that their induction is a normal aspect of differentiation. Furthermore, in the continuous presence of RA F9 teratocarcinoma cells show a differential ability to maintain Hox-2 expression depending upon whether the cells follow a visceral or parietal endoderm pathway. These data suggest a clear dependence of Hox-2 expression on the degree and type of differentiation in different cells. However, RA also has dramatic differentiation independent effects on Hox-2 regulation. In ES cells the levels of Hox expression are greatly enhanced by exposure to RA, and in F9 cells of the visceral or parietal phenotype the continuous presence of RA is required to maintain these high levels. Nuclear run-on experiments illustrate that Hox-2 genes are active in F9 stem cells and that a large portion of the RA induction is mediated by post-transcriptional mechanisms. Therefore RA exerts its effects on Hox-2 expression by upregulating or modulating genes which are already active, rather than by turning-on silent genes. All nine Hox-2 genes are induced in F9 cells by RA and there is a direct correlation (collinearity) between gene order and the relative dose response of each gene to RA. In Xenopus embryos treated with RA, homologues of the Hox-2 genes also displayed a temporal and dose response collinearity with gene organisation. Together these findings suggest that the collinear response to RA is highly conserved in vertebrates and combined with the ability of RA to modify expression during cellular differentiation could be an important feature of the Hox-2 cluster itself used to generate the spatially-restricted patterns of gene expression in embryogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1682879      PMCID: PMC328948          DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.20.5497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  63 in total

1.  Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis.

Authors:  C Tickle; D Summerbell; L Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Segmental expression of Hox-2 homoeobox-containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain.

Authors:  D G Wilkinson; S Bhatt; M Cook; E Boncinelli; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Differential expression of human HOX-2 genes along the anterior-posterior axis in embryonic central nervous system.

Authors:  A Giampaolo; D Acampora; V Zappavigna; M Pannese; M D'Esposito; A Carè; A Faiella; A Stornaiuolo; G Russo; A Simeone
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.880

4.  Interference with function of a homeobox gene in Xenopus embryos produces malformations of the anterior spinal cord.

Authors:  C V Wright; K W Cho; J Hardwicke; R H Collins; E M De Robertis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-10-06       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Cell interactions modulate embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation into parietal or visceral endoderm.

Authors:  B L Hogan; A Taylor; E Adamson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Microinjection of synthetic Xhox-1A homeobox mRNA disrupts somite formation in developing Xenopus embryos.

Authors:  R P Harvey; D A Melton
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Identification of a retinoic acid-sensitive period during primary axis formation in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  H L Sive; B W Draper; R M Harland; H Weintraub
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression.

Authors:  A Graham; N Papalopulu; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Retinoid-binding protein distribution in the developing mammalian nervous system.

Authors:  M Maden; D E Ong; F Chytil
Journal:  Development       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes.

Authors:  D Duboule; P Dollé
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  18 in total

1.  Epigenetic Interactions and Gene Expression in Peri-Implantation Mouse Embryo Development.

Authors:  Jean J Latimer; Roger A Pedersen
Journal:  Mod Cell Biol       Date:  1993

2.  Effects of nutrient deprivation and differentiation on the expression of growth-arrest genes (gas and gadd) in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  J V Fleming; S M Hay; D N Harries; W D Rees
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Isolation and characterization of the human homeobox gene HOX D1.

Authors:  B Appukuttan; R Sood; S Ott; I Makalowska; R J Patel; X Wang; C M Robbins; M J Brownstein; J T Stout
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Retinoic Acid Organizes the Zebrafish Vagus Motor Topographic Map via Spatiotemporal Coordination of Hgf/Met Signaling.

Authors:  Adam J Isabella; Gabrielle R Barsh; Jason A Stonick; Julien Dubrulle; Cecilia B Moens
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 12.270

5.  Retinoid X receptor-selective ligands produce malformations in Xenopus embryos.

Authors:  S Minucci; J P Saint-Jeannet; R Toyama; G Scita; L M DeLuca; M Tiara; A A Levin; K Ozato; I B Dawid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system.

Authors:  Z N Akin; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.046

7.  Identification of a retinoic acid response element upstream of the murine Hox-4.2 gene.

Authors:  H Pöpperl; M S Featherstone
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription.

Authors:  Séverine Chambeyron; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Ring1B compacts chromatin structure and represses gene expression independent of histone ubiquitination.

Authors:  Ragnhild Eskeland; Martin Leeb; Graeme R Grimes; Clémence Kress; Shelagh Boyle; Duncan Sproul; Nick Gilbert; Yuhong Fan; Arthur I Skoultchi; Anton Wutz; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  p160 Myb-binding protein interacts with Prep1 and inhibits its transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Víctor M Díaz; Silvia Mori; Elena Longobardi; Guillermo Menendez; Carmelo Ferrai; Rebecca A Keough; Angela Bachi; Francesco Blasi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.