Literature DB >> 16828059

Recognition forces in ligand-protein complexes: blending information from different sources.

Giuseppe Ermondi1, Giulia Caron.   

Abstract

A variety of ligands interact with proteins in many biological processes; shape complementarity, electrostatic forces and hydrophobicity are the main factors governing these interactions. Although this is accepted by the scientific community, confusion about the significance of certain terms (e.g. hydrophobicity, salt bridge) and the difficulty of discussing the balance of acting forces rather than their single contributions, are two of the main problems encountered by researchers working in the field. These difficulties are sometimes enhanced by the unskilled use of informatics tools, which give great help in understanding the topic (especially from the visual standpoint), but only if used critically. After explaining some general chemical concepts, the commentary discusses the main forces governing ligand-protein interactions, focusing on those generating confusion among scientists with different backgrounds. Three examples of ligand-protein interactions are then discussed to illustrate the advantages and drawbacks of some in silico tools, highlighting the main interactions responsible for complex formation. The same examples are used to point out the limits in separating forces that are mandatory for occurrence of a given interaction and additional forces.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16828059     DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  6 in total

1.  Chemical space: missing pieces in cheminformatics.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Rishi R Gupta; Eric Gifford; Barry A Bunin; Chris L Waller
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Lipophilicity and its relationship with passive drug permeation.

Authors:  Xiangli Liu; Bernard Testa; Alfred Fahr
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Elucidating the exact role of engineered CRABPII residues for the formation of a retinal protonated Schiff base.

Authors:  Chrysoula Vasileiou; Wenjing Wang; Xiaofei Jia; Kin Sing Stephen Lee; Camille T Watson; James H Geiger; Babak Borhan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-12

4.  Dissection of the critical binding determinants of cellular retinoic acid binding protein II by mutagenesis and fluorescence binding assay.

Authors:  Chrysoula Vasileiou; Kin Sing Stephen Lee; Rachael M Crist; Soheila Vaezeslami; Sarah M Goins; James H Geiger; Babak Borhan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-08-01

5.  Pushing the Ligand Efficiency Metrics: Relative Group Contribution (RGC) Model as a Helpful Strategy to Promote a Fragment "Rescue" Effect.

Authors:  Andrés Felipe Vásquez; Andrés González Barrios
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.221

6.  Multivariate PLS Modeling of Apicomplexan FabD-Ligand Interaction Space for Mapping Target-Specific Chemical Space and Pharmacophore Fingerprints.

Authors:  Ashalatha Sreshty Mamidi; Prerna Arora; Avadhesha Surolia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.