Literature DB >> 16825748

Ultra-thin TLDs for skin dose determination in high energy photon beams.

S Stathakis1, J S Li, K Paskalev, J Yang, L Wang, C-M Ma.   

Abstract

Estimation of surface dose is very important for patients undergoing radiation therapy. In this work we investigate the dose at the surface of a water phantom and at a depth of 0.007 cm, the practical reference depth for skin as recommended by ICRP and ICRU, with ultra-thin TLDs and Monte Carlo calculations. The calculations and measurements were carried out for fields ranging from 5 x 5 cm2 to 20 x 20 cm2 for 6 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV photon beams. The variation of the surface dose with angle of incidence and field size was investigated. Also, the exit dose was computed and measured for the same fields and angles of incidence. The dose at the ICRU reference depth was computed. Good agreement (+/-5%) was achieved between measurements and calculations. The surface dose at the entrance increased with the angle of incidence and/or the field size. The exit dose decreased with the angle of incidence but it increased with field size. The dose at the surface of the patient is mostly dependent on the beam energy, modality and beam obliquity rather than the field size and field separation. By correlating TLD measurements with Monte Carlo calculations, we were able to predict the dose at the skin surface with good accuracy. Knowing the dose received at the surface of the patient can lead to prediction of skin reactions helping with the design of new treatment techniques and alternative dose fractionation schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825748     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/14/018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-25

3.  Estimation of Skin doses for Retrofit Prototype Multileaf Collimators Designed for Telecobalt Therapy Machine.

Authors:  Akula Roopa Rani; Komanduri Ayyangar; A R Reddy; Ayyalasomayajula Anil Kumar; Pal Reddy Yadagiri Reddy
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-02

4.  An investigation of the depth dose in the build-up region, and surface dose for a 6-MV therapeutic photon beam: Monte Carlo simulation and measurements.

Authors:  Lukkana Apipunyasopon; Somyot Srisatit; Nakorn Phaisangittisakul
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj; Girigesh Yadav; Ananda Giribabu; Karthikeyan Srinivasan; Venkadamanickam Gurusamy; Kothanda Raman; Kaviarasu Karunakaran; Rajesh Thiyagarajan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

6.  Equivalent square formula for determining the surface dose of rectangular field from 6 MV therapeutic photon beam.

Authors:  Lukkana Apipunyasopon; Somyot Srisatit; Nakorn Phaisangittisakul
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Measurement of skin surface dose distributions in radiation therapy using poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel dosimeters.

Authors:  Molham M Eyadeh; Marcin Wierzbicki; Kevin R Diamond
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Skin dose during radiotherapy: a summary and general estimation technique.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Susan A Smith; Rita Weathers; Marilyn Stovall
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.