Literature DB >> 16825301

Rapid-rate paired associative stimulation of the median nerve and motor cortex can produce long-lasting changes in motor cortical excitability in humans.

Angelo Quartarone1, Vincenzo Rizzo, Sergio Bagnato, Francesca Morgante, Antonino Sant'Angelo, Paolo Girlanda, Hartwig Roman Siebner.   

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or repetitive electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (rENS) can induce changes in the excitability of the human motor cortex (M1) that is often short-lasting and variable, and occurs only after prolonged periods of stimulation. In 10 healthy volunteers, we used a new repetitive paired associative stimulation (rPAS) protocol to facilitate and prolong the effects of rENS and rTMS on cortical excitability. Sub-motor threshold 5 Hz rENS of the right median nerve was synchronized with submotor threshold 5 Hz rTMS of the left M1 at a constant interval for 2 min. The interstimulus interval (ISI) between the peripheral stimulus and the transcranial stimulation was set at 10 ms (5 Hz rPAS10ms) or 25 ms (5 Hz rPAS25ms). TMS was given over the hot spot of the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. Before and after rPAS, we measured the amplitude of the unconditioned motor evoked potential (MEP), intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF), short- and long-latency afferent inhibition (SAI and LAI) in the conditioned M1. The 5 Hz rPAS25ms protocol but not the 5 Hz rPAS10ms protocol caused a somatotopically specific increase in mean MEP amplitudes in the relaxed APB muscle. The 5 Hz rPAS25ms protocol also led to a loss of SAI, but there was no correlation between individual changes in SAI and corticospinal excitability. These after-effects were still present 6 h after 5 Hz rPAS25ms. There was no consistent effect on ICI, ICF and LAI. The 5 Hz rENS and 5 Hz rTMS protocols failed to induce any change in corticospinal excitability when given alone. These findings show that 2 min of 5 Hz rPAS25ms produce a long-lasting and somatotopically specific increase in corticospinal excitability, presumably by sensorimotor disinhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825301      PMCID: PMC1819453          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.114025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  44 in total

Review 1.  TMS induced plasticity in human cortex.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.353

2.  Short-term modulation of regional excitability and blood flow in human motor cortex following rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Beatrice Takano; Alexander Drzezga; Martin Peller; Iris Sax; Markus Schwaiger; Lucy Lee; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Repetitive paired-pulse TMS at I-wave periodicity markedly increases corticospinal excitability: a new technique for modulating synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Gary W Thickbroom; Michelle L Byrnes; Dylan J Edwards; Frank L Mastaglia
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  Elementary forms of synaptic plasticity in the visual cortex.

Authors:  A Kirkwood; M F Bear
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.612

5.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; D Restuccia; A Oliviero; P Profice; L Ferrara; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kujirai; M D Caramia; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; A Ferbert; S Wroe; P Asselman; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Motor areas of the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  J P Donoghue; J N Sanes
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.177

8.  Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans.

Authors:  K J Werhahn; E Kunesch; S Noachtar; R Benecke; J Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  R Chen; J Classen; C Gerloff; P Celnik; E M Wassermann; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Continuous intrathecal baclofen infusions induced a marked increase of the transcranially evoked silent period in a patient with generalized dystonia.

Authors:  H R Siebner; J Dressnandt; C Auer; B Conrad
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.217

View more
  36 in total

1.  The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; John C Rothwell; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Defective cerebellar control of cortical plasticity in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Cecile Hubsch; Emmanuel Roze; Traian Popa; Margherita Russo; Ammu Balachandran; Salini Pradeep; Florian Mueller; Vanessa Brochard; Angelo Quartarone; Bertrand Degos; Marie Vidailhet; Asha Kishore; Sabine Meunier
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Interindividual variability and age-dependency of motor cortical plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  J Florian M Müller-Dahlhaus; Yuriy Orekhov; Yali Liu; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spinal and cortical activity-dependent plasticity following learning of complex arm movements in humans.

Authors:  T Winkler; B Mergner; J Szecsi; A Bender; A Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Short-latency afferent inhibition determined by the sensory afferent volley.

Authors:  Aaron Z Bailey; Michael J Asmussen; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Failed Attempt With Paired Associative Stimulation to Separate Functional and Organic Dystonia.

Authors:  Vesper Fe Marie Llaneza Ramos; Prachaya Srivanitchapoom; Nivethida Thirugnanasambandam; Sanjay Pandey; Angela Holmes; Sahana N Kukke; Rainer Paine; Elaine Considine; Nguyet Dang; Tianxia Wu; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 10.338

7.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances BDNF-TrkB signaling in both brain and lymphocyte.

Authors:  Hoau-Yan Wang; Domenica Crupi; Jingjing Liu; Andres Stucky; Giuseppe Cruciata; Alessandro Di Rocco; Eitan Friedman; Angelo Quartarone; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  TMS enhances retention of a motor skill in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Clara Moisello; Daniella Blanco; Cecilia Fontanesi; Jing Lin; Milton Biagioni; Pawan Kumar; Miroslaw Brys; Andrea Loggini; Lucio Marinelli; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Angelo Quartarone; Giulio Tononi; Alessandro Di Rocco; Maria Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Increased use-dependent plasticity in chronic insomnia.

Authors:  Rachel E Salas; Joseph M Galea; Alyssa A Gamaldo; Charlene E Gamaldo; Richard P Allen; Michael T Smith; Gabriela Cantarero; Barbara D Lam; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 10.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.