Literature DB >> 18320180

Interindividual variability and age-dependency of motor cortical plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation.

J Florian M Müller-Dahlhaus1, Yuriy Orekhov, Yali Liu, Ulf Ziemann.   

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) can increase motor cortical excitability, possibly by long-term potentiation (LTP)-like mechanisms. As the capability of the cortex for plasticity decreases with age, we were interested here in testing interindividual variability and age-dependency of the PAS effect. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the resting right abductor pollicis brevis muscle before and for 30 min after PAS in 27 healthy subjects (22-71 years of age). PAS consisted of 225 pairs (rate, 0.25 Hz) of right median nerve stimulation followed at an interval equaling the individual N20-latency of the median nerve somatosensory-evoked cortical potential plus 2 ms by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the hand area of left primary motor cortex (PAS(N20+2)). The PAS(N20+2)-induced changes in MEP amplitude (ratio post PAS/pre PAS) were highly variable (1.00 +/- 0.07, range 0.36-1.68). Fourteen subjects showed the expected LTP-like MEP increase (responders) while 13 subjects showed a long-term depression (LTD)-like MEP decrease (non-responders). Responders had a significantly lower resting motor threshold (RMT) and minimum stimulus intensity to elicit MEPs of 1 mV (MEP(1 mV)) than non-responders. RMT and MEP(1 mV) correlated significantly negatively with the PAS(N20+2) effect. The absolute PAS(N20+2) effect size irrespective of its direction decreased with age (r = -0.57, P = 0.002), i.e., LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity were large in young subjects but substantially smaller in elderly subjects. In conclusion, measures of motor cortical excitability (RMT, MEP(1 mV)) and age determine direction and magnitude of PAS effects in individual subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18320180     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1319-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

1.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J C Keel; M J Smith; E M Wassermann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Matthias Wycislo; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Differences between the effects of three plasticity inducing protocols on the organization of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Alterations in trkB mRNA in the human prefrontal cortex throughout the lifespan.

Authors:  T B Romanczyk; C Shannon Weickert; M J Webster; M M Herman; M Akil; J E Kleinman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Progressive decrease in heteronymous monosynaptic Ia facilitation with human ageing.

Authors:  H Morita; M Shindo; S Yanagawa; T Yoshida; H Momoi; N Yanagisawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Wolters; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Antje Schlottmann; Erwin Kunesch; Katja Stefan; Leonardo G Cohen; Reiner Benecke; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spinal excitation and inhibition decrease as humans age.

Authors:  Aiko Kido; Naofumi Tanaka; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 8.  The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; F Pilato; E Saturno; M Dileone; P Mazzone; A Insola; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Associative plasticity in human motor cortex during voluntary muscle contraction.

Authors:  Kayoko Kujirai; Takashi Kujirai; Thomas Sinkjaer; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Suppression of LTP-like plasticity in human motor cortex by the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen.

Authors:  Michelle N McDonnell; Yuri Orekhov; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  114 in total

1.  Plasticity in human motor cortex is in part genetically determined.

Authors:  Julia Missitzi; Reinhard Gentner; Nickos Geladas; Panagiotis Politis; Nikos Karandreas; Joseph Classen; Vassilis Klissouras
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Modulation of preparatory volitional motor cortical activity by paired associative transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Ming-Kuei Lu; Barbara Bliem; Patrick Jung; Noritoshi Arai; Chon-Haw Tsai; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Noninvasive brain stimulation can elucidate and interact with the mechanisms underlying motor learning and retention: implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Paola Reissig; Hakuei Fujiyama
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M C Ridding; U Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Remote muscle priming anodal transcranial direct current stimulation attenuates short interval intracortical inhibition and increases time to task failure of a constant workload cycling exercise.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Plasticity of cortical inhibition in dystonia is impaired after motor learning and paired-associative stimulation.

Authors:  Sabine Meunier; Heike Russmann; Ejaz Shamim; Jean-Charles Lamy; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Cortical Paired Associative Stimulation Influences Response Inhibition: Cortico-cortical and Cortico-subcortical Networks.

Authors:  Sina Kohl; Ricci Hannah; Lorenzo Rocchi; Camilla L Nord; John Rothwell; Valerie Voon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability predicts antidepressant response to prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Daniel Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Asif Jamil; Shane Fresnoza; Giorgi Batsikadze; Min-Fang Kuo; Benjamin Vanderschelden; Richard B Ivry; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: enhancing motor and cognitive functions in healthy old subjects.

Authors:  Maximo Zimerman; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.