Literature DB >> 16824492

Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.

Elif Kirmizi-Alsan1, Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu, Hakan Gurvit, Yasemin H Keskin, Murat Emre, Tamer Demiralp.   

Abstract

Neuropsychological tests target specific cognitive functions; however, numerous cognitive subcomponents are involved in each test. The aim of this study was to decompose the components of two frontal executive function tests, Go/NoGo (GNG) and cued continuous performance task (CPT), by analyzing event-related potentials (ERPs) of 24 subjects both in time and time-frequency domains. In the time domain, P1, N1, P2, N2 and P3 peak amplitudes and latencies and mean amplitudes of 100 ms time windows of the post-P3 time period were measured. For GNG, the N1 amplitude and for both GNG and CPT N2 amplitudes were significantly higher in the NoGo condition compared with the Go condition. P3 had a central maximum in the NoGo conditions of both paradigms in contrast to a parietal maximum in the Go conditions. All peaks except P1 and mean amplitudes of the post-P3 period were more positive in CPT compared to those of GNG. N1, N2 and P3 latencies were longer for the NoGo condition than the Go condition in the CPT. In time-frequency analyses, the NoGo condition evoked higher theta coefficients than the Go condition, whereas the CPT and GNG paradigms differed mainly in the delta band. These results suggest that theta component reflects response inhibition in both GNG and CPT, whereas delta component reflects the more demanding sustained attention requirement of the CPT. The latency prolongation observed with the NoGo condition of the CPT paradigm was thought to be due to perseverance/inhibition conflict enhanced by the primer stimuli in CPT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16824492     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  52 in total

1.  Frequency spectrum might act as communication code between retina and visual cortex I.

Authors:  Xu Yang; Bo Gong; Jian-Wei Lu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Cortical sources of visual evoked potentials during consciousness of executive processes.

Authors:  Claudio Babiloni; Fabrizio Vecchio; Marco Iacoboni; Paola Buffo; Fabrizio Eusebi; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Dissociable recruitment of rostral anterior cingulate and inferior frontal cortex in emotional response inhibition.

Authors:  Pearl H Chiu; Avram J Holmes; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Stimulus sequence context differentially modulates inhibition-related theta and delta band activity in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Don't make me angry, you wouldn't like me when I'm angry: Volitional choices to act or inhibit are modulated by subliminal perception of emotional faces.

Authors:  Jim Parkinson; Sarah Garfinkel; Hugo Critchley; Zoltan Dienes; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: evidence from neurophysiology and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  When the brain simulates stopping: Neural activity recorded during real and imagined stop-signal tasks.

Authors:  Alberto J González-Villar; F Mauricio Bonilla; María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  ADHD candidate gene (DRD4 exon III) affects inhibitory control in a healthy sample.

Authors:  Ulrike M Krämer; Nuria Rojo; Rebecca Schüle; Toni Cunillera; Ludger Schöls; Josep Marco-Pallarés; David Cucurell; Estela Camara; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Oscillatory brain activity related to control mechanisms during laboratory-induced reactive aggression.

Authors:  Ulrike M Krämer; Robert P J Kopyciok; Sylvia Richter; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.