Literature DB >> 16824010

Streamlining and simplification of microbial genome architecture.

Michael Lynch1.   

Abstract

The genomes of unicellular species, particularly prokaryotes, are greatly reduced in size and simplified in terms of gene structure relative to those of multicellular eukaryotes. Arguments proposed to explain this disparity include selection for metabolic efficiency and elevated rates of deletion in microbes, but the evidence in support of these hypotheses is at best equivocal. An alternative explanation based on fundamental population-genetic principles is proposed here. By increasing the mutational target sizes of associated genes, most forms of nonfunctional DNA are opposed by weak selection. Free-living microbial species have elevated effective population sizes, and the consequent reduction in the power of random genetic drift appears to be sufficient to enable natural selection to inhibit the accumulation of excess DNA. This hypothesis provides a potentially unifying explanation for the continuity in genomic scaling from prokaryotes to multicellular eukaryotes, the divergent patterns of mitochondrial evolution in animals and land plants, and various aspects of genomic modification in microbial endosymbionts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16824010     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol        ISSN: 0066-4227            Impact factor:   15.500


  103 in total

1.  Extensive loss of RNA editing sites in rapidly evolving Silene mitochondrial genomes: selection vs. retroprocessing as the driving force.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Alice H MacQueen; Andrew J Alverson; Jeffrey D Palmer; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The bioenergetic costs of a gene.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Georgi K Marinov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multiple Barriers to the Evolution of Alternative Gene Orders in a Positive-Strand RNA Virus.

Authors:  Anouk Willemsen; Mark P Zwart; Nicolas Tromas; Eszter Majer; José-Antonio Daròs; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The consequences of genetic drift for bacterial genome complexity.

Authors:  Chih-Horng Kuo; Nancy A Moran; Howard Ochman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Trends in prokaryotic evolution revealed by comparison of closely related bacterial and archaeal genomes.

Authors:  Pavel S Novichkov; Yuri I Wolf; Inna Dubchak; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Adaptive Evolution of Thermotoga maritima Reveals Plasticity of the ABC Transporter Network.

Authors:  Haythem Latif; Merve Sahin; Janna Tarasova; Yekaterina Tarasova; Vasiliy A Portnoy; Juan Nogales; Karsten Zengler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Neutral forces acting on intragenomic variability shape the Escherichia coli regulatory network topology.

Authors:  Troy Ruths; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Localized plasticity in the streamlined genomes of vinyl chloride respiring Dehalococcoides.

Authors:  Paul J McMurdie; Sebastian F Behrens; Jochen A Müller; Jonathan Göke; Kirsti M Ritalahti; Ryan Wagner; Eugene Goltsman; Alla Lapidus; Susan Holmes; Frank E Löffler; Alfred M Spormann
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Streamlining and large ancestral genomes in Archaea inferred with a phylogenetic birth-and-death model.

Authors:  Miklós Csurös; István Miklós
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  On the need for widespread horizontal gene transfers under genome size constraint.

Authors:  Hervé Isambert; Richard R Stein
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.