Literature DB >> 16823959

Quality control metrics for LC-MS feature detection tools demonstrated on Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteomic profiles.

Brian D Piening1, Pei Wang, Chaitanya S Bangur, Jeffrey Whiteaker, Heidi Zhang, Li-Chia Feng, John F Keane, Jimmy K Eng, Hua Tang, Amol Prakash, Martin W McIntosh, Amanda Paulovich.   

Abstract

Quantitative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is emerging as an important tool for biomarker discovery, prompting development of algorithms for high-throughput peptide feature detection in complex samples. However, neither annotated standard data sets nor quality control metrics currently exist for assessing the validity of feature detection algorithms. We propose a quality control metric, Mass Deviance, for assessing the accuracy of feature detection tools. Because the Mass Deviance metric is derived from the natural distribution of peptide masses, it is machine- and proteome-independent and enables assessment of feature detection tools in the absence of completely annotated data sets. We validate the use of Mass Deviance with a second, independent metric that is based on isotopic distributions, demonstrating that we can use Mass Deviance to identify aberrant features with high accuracy. We then demonstrate the use of independent metrics in tandem as a robust way to evaluate the performance of peptide feature detection algorithms. This work is done on complex LC-MS profiles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae which present a significant challenge to peptide feature detection algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16823959     DOI: 10.1021/pr050436j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  13 in total

1.  Meta-analysis for protein identification: a case study on yeast data.

Authors:  Roger Higdon; Winston Haynes; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-06

2.  Bayesian nonparametric model for the validation of peptide identification in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Jiyang Zhang; Jie Ma; Lei Dou; Songfeng Wu; Xiaohong Qian; Hongwei Xie; Yunping Zhu; Fuchu He
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Direct iterative protein profiling (DIPP) - an innovative method for large-scale protein detection applied to budding yeast mitosis.

Authors:  Régis Lavigne; Emmanuelle Becker; Yuchen Liu; Bertrand Evrard; Aurélie Lardenois; Michael Primig; Charles Pineau
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  SVM model for quality assessment of medium resolution mass spectra from 18O-water labeling experiments.

Authors:  Alexey V Nefedov; Miroslaw J Gilski; Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Improving proteome coverage on a LTQ-Orbitrap using design of experiments.

Authors:  Genna L Andrews; Ralph A Dean; Adam M Hawkridge; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Systematic characterization of high mass accuracy influence on false discovery and probability scoring in peptide mass fingerprinting.

Authors:  Eric D Dodds; Brian H Clowers; Paul J Hagerman; Carlito B Lebrilla
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 7.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.281

8.  Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance.

Authors:  Amanda G Paulovich; Dean Billheimer; Amy-Joan L Ham; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Paul A Rudnick; David L Tabb; Pei Wang; Ronald K Blackman; David M Bunk; Helene L Cardasis; Karl R Clauser; Christopher R Kinsinger; Birgit Schilling; Tony J Tegeler; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Mu Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lisa J Zimmerman; David Fenyo; Steven A Carr; Susan J Fisher; Bradford W Gibson; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Fred E Regnier; Henry Rodriguez; Cliff Spiegelman; Stephen E Stein; Paul Tempst; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Directed sample interrogation utilizing an accurate mass exclusion-based data-dependent acquisition strategy (AMEx).

Authors:  Emily L Rudomin; Steven A Carr; Jacob D Jaffe
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Improved quality control processing of peptide-centric LC-MS proteomics data.

Authors:  Melissa M Matzke; Katrina M Waters; Thomas O Metz; Jon M Jacobs; Amy C Sims; Ralph S Baric; Joel G Pounds; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.