Literature DB >> 16823295

Changes in the utilization of spinal fusion in the United States.

John A Cowan1, Justin B Dimick, Reid Wainess, Gilbert R Upchurch, William F Chandler, Frank La Marca.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several reports suggest that spine surgery has experienced rapid growth in the past decade. Limited data exist, however, documenting the increase in spinal fusion. The objective of this work was to quantify and characterize the contemporary practice of spinal fusion in the United States.
METHODS: Clinical data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for the years from 1993 to 2003. All patients with International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes indicating cervical fusion, thoracolumbar fusion, lumbar or unspecified fusion were identified (n = 471,990). Primary ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes were used to determine the rationale for surgical fusion. Population-based utilization rates overall and for each procedure were calculated from United States census data. Rank order of spinal fusion compared with other inpatient procedures from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was reported for the years 1997 to 2003.
RESULTS: Overall utilization increased during the time period for cervical, thoracolumbar, and lumbar fusions by 89, 31, and 134%, respectively. Patients aged 40 to 59 years experienced the rapid rise in utilization for cervical fusions (60-110 per 100,000) and lumbar fusions (35-84 per 100,000). For patients 60 years and older, utilization also increased for cervical (30-67 per 100,000), thoracolumbar (4-9 per 100,000), and lumbar (42-108 per 100,000). Spinal fusion rose from the 41st most common inpatient procedure in 1997 to the 19th in 2003.
CONCLUSION: Cervical, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spinal fusion have experienced a rapid increase in utilization in isolation and compared with other surgical procedures in contemporary practice. These changes are most pronounced for patients over 40 years of age, and degenerative disc disease seems to account for much of this increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16823295     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000219836.54861.CD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  43 in total

1.  Perioperative morbidity and mortality after anterior, posterior, and anterior/posterior spine fusion surgery.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Vassilios I Vougioukas; Yan Ma; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Perioperative mortality after lumbar spinal fusion surgery: an analysis of epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  Matthias Pumberger; Ya Lin Chiu; Yan Ma; Federico P Girardi; Vassilios Vougioukas; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  No difference in 9-year outcome in CLBP patients randomized to lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises.

Authors:  Anne Froholdt; Olav Reikeraas; Inger Holm; Anne Keller; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of 5766 vertebral compression fractures treated with or without kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Jay M Zampini; Andrew P White; Kevin J McGuire
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Stem cells for spine surgery.

Authors:  Joshua Schroeder; Janina Kueper; Kaplan Leon; Meir Liebergall
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Dose-dependent response of tissue-engineered intervertebral discs to dynamic unconfined compressive loading.

Authors:  Katherine D Hudson; Robert I Mozia; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Lumbar Spine Surgeries and Medication Usage During Hospital Stay: One-Center Perspective.

Authors:  Neena K Sharma; Busuyi Olotu; Asha Mathew; Lemuel R Waitman; Rafia Rasu
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-11-09

8.  How do coverage policies influence practice patterns, safety, and cost of initial lumbar fusion surgery? A population-based comparison of workers' compensation systems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Gary M Franklin; Richard A Deyo; Thomas M Wickizer; Jonathan D Lurie; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Intervertebral disc tissue engineering using a novel hyaluronic acid-nanofibrous scaffold (HANFS) amalgam.

Authors:  Leon J Nesti; Wan-Ju Li; Rabie M Shanti; Yi Jen Jiang; Wesley Jackson; Brett A Freedman; Timothy R Kuklo; Jeffrey R Giuliani; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jens Ivar Brox; Øystein P Nygaard; Inger Holm; Anne Keller; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.