Literature DB >> 16820971

Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs.

Xiaohua Guo1, Defa Li, Wenqing Lu, Xiangshu Piao, Xiaoling Chen.   

Abstract

A total of 124 samples were collected from the intestine of broiler chickens, piglet faeces, fermented foods, soils and Chinese herbs. More than 750 strains of aerobic, spore-forming bacteria were isolated from these samples. The inhibitory activity of these spore-forming strains against Escherichia coli K88, E. coli K99, Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus was assessed using a disc plate diffusion assay. The six bacilli with the largest inhibition zones against the four indicator bacteria were chosen and assessed for their resistance to unfavorable conditions within simulated gut environments. The strain Bacillus subtilis MA139 showed full resistance to pH 2, 0.3% bile salts and exhibited the highest antimicrobial activity. Based on these results, B. subtilis MA139 was selected as a potential probiotic and fed to piglets at concentrations of 2.2 x 10(5), 2.2 x 10(6) or 2.2 x 10(7) CFU/g of feed during a 28-day feeding trial. A negative control consisting of the basal diet with no additives and a positive control consisting of the basal diet supplemented with 16 g/ton flavomycin were also included. Ninety piglets between 35 and 40 days old were used in the in vivo animal trials. B. subtilis MA139 enhanced daily gain (P = 0.10) and feed conversion (P = 0.03) compared with the negative control. The performance of pigs fed B. subtilis MA139 supplemented diets did not differ from that of pigs fed the antibiotic diet. There was a significant increase in Lactobacilli cell counts (P = 0.02) and a numerical decrease in E. coli counts (P = 0.05) in the faecal samples of pigs fed B. subtilis MA139 with 2.2 x 10(5) CFU/g of feed. The overall results of this study show that the use of initial co-culture with indicator pathogens, a disc plate diffusion assay and simulated gut environment tolerance tests is one of effective methods of screening Bacillus for probiotic use and that B. subtilis MA139 is a promising alternative to antibiotics for use as a feed additive in piglet diets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16820971     DOI: 10.1007/s10482-006-9067-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek        ISSN: 0003-6072            Impact factor:   2.271


  28 in total

1.  ARTP mutation and adaptive laboratory evolution improve probiotic performance of Bacillus coagulans.

Authors:  KaiYue Liu; Hua Fang; FengJie Cui; Belinda Amanda Nyabako; TingLei Tao; XinYi Zan; Huayou Chen; WenJing Sun
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Reduction of aflatoxins by Rhizopus oryzae and Trichoderma reesei.

Authors:  H C S Hackbart; A R Machado; A Christ-Ribeiro; L Prietto; E Badiale-Furlong
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.833

3.  Microbial competition between Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus monitored by imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  David J Gonzalez; Nina M Haste; Andrew Hollands; Tinya C Fleming; Matthew Hamby; Kit Pogliano; Victor Nizet; Pieter C Dorrestein
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.777

4.  Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens US573 on Intestinal Morphology and Gut Microbiota of European Sea Bass.

Authors:  Hichem Chouayekh; Ameny Farhat-Khemakhem; Fatma Karray; Insaf Boubaker; Najla Mhiri; Manel Ben Abdallah; Othman A Alghamdi; Hamadi Guerbej
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 5.265

5.  Enhanced viability of Lactobacillus reuteri for probiotics production in mixed solid-state fermentation in the presence of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Yi-Ran Zhang; Hai-Rong Xiong; Xiao-Hua Guo
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Improved Production of Spores and Bioactive Metabolites from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in Solid-state Fermentation by a Rapid Optimization Process.

Authors:  Ya-Ting Su; Chun Liu; Zhu Long; Hang Ren; Xiao-Hua Guo
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Effect of Feeding Bacillus subtilis natto on Hindgut Fermentation and Microbiota of Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  D J Song; H Y Kang; J Q Wang; H Peng; D P Bu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Effects of a multi-strain Bacillus subtilis-based direct-fed microbial on weanling pig growth performance and nutrient digestibility.

Authors:  Jaron R Lewton; Adrienne D Woodward; Ronny L Moser; Kyan M Thelen; Adam J Moeser; Nathalie L Trottier; Robert J Tempelman; Dale W Rozeboom
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-20

9.  Live Bacillus subtilis natto Promotes Rumen Fermentation by Modulating Rumen Microbiota In Vitro.

Authors:  Meinan Chang; Fengtao Ma; Jingya Wei; Junhao Liu; Xuemei Nan; Peng Sun
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Energy and ileal digestible amino Acid concentrations for growing pigs and performance of weanling pigs fed fermented or conventional soybean meal.

Authors:  Y Wang; W Q Lu; D F Li; X T Liu; H L Wang; S Niu; X S Piao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.