Literature DB >> 16819999

Improved cortical entrainment to infant communication calls in mothers compared with virgin mice.

Robert C Liu1, Jennifer F Linden, Christoph E Schreiner.   

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the use of mice as a model system for species-specific communication. In particular, ultrasonic calls emitted by mouse pups communicate distress, and elicit a search and retrieval response from mothers. Behaviorally, mothers prefer and recognize these calls in two-alternative choice tests, in contrast to pup-naïve females that do not have experience with pups. Here, we explored whether one particular acoustic feature that defines these calls-- the repetition rate of calls within a bout-- is represented differently in the auditory cortex of these two animal groups. Multiunit recordings in anesthetized CBA/CaJ mice revealed that: (i) neural entrainment to repeated stimuli extended up to the natural pup call repetition rate (5 Hz) in mothers; but (ii) neurons in naïve females followed repeated stimuli well only at slower repetition rates; and (iii) entrained responses to repeated pup calls were less sensitive to natural pup call variability in mothers than in pup-naïve females. In the broader context, our data suggest that auditory cortical responses to communication sounds are plastic, and that communicative significance is correlated with an improved cortical representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16819999     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04840.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  48 in total

1.  Subset of thin spike cortical neurons preserve the peripheral encoding of stimulus onsets.

Authors:  Frank G Lin; Robert C Liu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Emergence of invariant representation of vocalizations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Isaac M Carruthers; Diego A Laplagne; Andrew Jaegle; John J Briguglio; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Ryan G Natan; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Understanding the neurophysiological basis of auditory abilities for social communication: a perspective on the value of ethological paradigms.

Authors:  Sharath Bennur; Joji Tsunada; Yale E Cohen; Robert C Liu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Context-dependent fluctuation of serotonin in the auditory midbrain: the influence of sex, reproductive state and experience.

Authors:  Jessica L Hanson; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Coding the meaning of sounds: contextual modulation of auditory responses in the basolateral amygdala.

Authors:  Jasmine M S Grimsley; Emily G Hazlett; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Nursing stimulation is more than tactile sensation: It is a multisensory experience.

Authors:  Marcelo Febo; Tara L Stolberg; Michael Numan; Robert S Bridges; Praveen Kulkarni; Craig F Ferris
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Sound rhythms are encoded by postinhibitory rebound spiking in the superior paraolivary nucleus.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Anders Fridberger; Sara Leijon; Albert S Berrebi; Anna K Magnusson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Experience restores innate female preference for male ultrasonic vocalizations.

Authors:  K N Shepard; R C Liu
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.449

9.  Encoding of temporal information by timing, rate, and place in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kazuo Imaizumi; Nicholas J Priebe; Tatyana O Sharpee; Steven W Cheung; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Asic3(-/-) female mice with hearing deficit affects social development of pups.

Authors:  Wei-Li Wu; Chih-Hung Wang; Eagle Yi-Kung Huang; Chih-Cheng Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.