Literature DB >> 16818973

Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques. a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report.

Andrea E Buckwalter1, John J Callaghan, Steve S Liu, Douglas R Pedersen, Devon D Goetz, Patrick M Sullivan, Jessica A Leinen, Richard C Johnston.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The current study was performed to determine the status, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a prospective, single-surgeon series of patients treated with primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty with a contemporary femoral cementing technique that included use of a distal cement plug and a retrograde cement-delivery system. Since our review at a minimum of twenty years postoperatively, two primary total hip prostheses were revised (one because of acetabular loosening, and one because of femoral loosening). Of the original cohort of 357 hips (320 patients), ten (2.8%) had revision of the femoral stem because of aseptic loosening. Forty-nine patients (fifty-two hips, 14.6%) who had been in the initial study group were still living at the time of the present review. Five hips (10%) in living patients had required a femoral revision because of aseptic loosening. Including those that were revised, eight femoral components (17%) in living patients were seen to be loose radiographically. Although this study demonstrates the remarkable durability of the femoral fixation obtained with the polished flatback Charnley prosthesis and the contemporary cementing technique, there was some deterioration of the results with time. These results provide a standard for comparison with cementless fixation after hips treated with that technique have been followed for a similar duration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16818973     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

Review 1.  Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Dean Pakvis; Gijs van Hellemondt; Enrico de Visser; Wilco Jacobs; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Mediators of the inflammatory response to joint replacement devices.

Authors:  Neil Cobelli; Brian Scharf; Giovanna M Crisi; John Hardin; Laura Santambrogio
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  Osteointegration of orthopaedic devices.

Authors:  Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 9.623

4.  What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Robert B Bourne; Kory D Charron; Keegan Au; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Systematic review of literature of cemented femoral components: what is the durability at minimum 20 years followup?

Authors:  Nicholas A Bedard; John J Callaghan; Michael D Stefl; Steve S Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  A prospective randomised radiostereometric analysis trial of SmartSet HV and Palacos R bone cements in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Otto S Husby; Kristin Haugan; Pål Benum; Olav A Foss
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03-03

7.  What Can We Learn From 20-year Followup Studies of Hip Replacement?

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; John J Callaghan; Yubo Gao; Andrew J Pugely; Steve S Liu; Lucian C Warth; Devon D Goetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years and older.

Authors:  Keijo T Mäkelä; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka Paavolainen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Ville Remes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Good results with cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients between 40 and 50 years of age.

Authors:  Daniël C J de Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; René P H Veth; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  THA with hydroxyapatite granules at cement-bone interface: 15- to 20-year results.

Authors:  Hironobu Oonishi; Hirotsugu Ohashi; Hiroyuki Oonishi; Sok Chol Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.