Literature DB >> 16817985

Psychological factors in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: comparisons with non-patients and associations with symptoms.

Anthony P Morrison1, Paul French, Shôn W Lewis, Morwenna Roberts, Shreeta Raja, Sandra T Neil, Sophie Parker, Joanne Green, Aoiffe Kilcommons, Lara Walford, Richard P Bentall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been recent advances in the ability to identify people at high risk of developing psychosis. This has led to interest in the possibility of preventing the development of psychosis and provides the opportunity to investigate psychological mechanisms that may confer vulnerability to psychosis.
METHOD: Fifty-eight patients at ultra-high risk of developing a first episode of psychosis were compared with 56 non-patients matched for age and occupational status on measures of meta-cognition, schizotypal traits, dysfunctional attitudes and distress.
RESULTS: Analyses of covariance revealed that people at high risk of developing psychosis scored higher on measures of cognitive vulnerability, including negative meta-cognitive beliefs, beliefs about rejection and criticism from others, and discrepancies in self-perception, schizotypal traits and general mental distress. Correlational analyses revealed that negative meta-cognitive beliefs, dysfunctional attitudes and beliefs about rejection and criticism from others were positively associated with several dimensions of symptomatology in at-risk mental states (ARMS) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive and personality factors appear to characterize people at high-risk of developing psychosis and are associated with their distressing experiences. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16817985     DOI: 10.1017/S0033291706007768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  8 in total

1.  Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultrahigh risk.

Authors:  Anthony P Morrison; Paul French; Sophie Parker; Morwenna Roberts; Helen Stevens; Richard P Bentall; Shôn W Lewis
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Schizotypy, psychotic-like experiences and distress: an interaction model.

Authors:  Emily Kline; Camille Wilson; Sabrina Ereshefsky; Katie L Nugent; Steven Pitts; Gloria Reeves; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  The role of vulnerability factors in individuals with an at-risk mental state of psychosis.

Authors:  Martina Papmeyer; Irène Würsch; Erich Studerus; Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz; Anita Riecher-Rössler
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr       Date:  2016-03-11

4.  Developmental Trajectories of Cortical Thickness in Relation to Schizotypy During Adolescence.

Authors:  Mélodie Derome; Emiliana Tonini; Daniela Zöller; Marie Schaer; Stephan Eliez; Martin Debbané
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Resting EEG in psychosis and at-risk populations--a possible endophenotype?

Authors:  Siri Ranlund; Judith Nottage; Madiha Shaikh; Anirban Dutt; Miguel Constante; Muriel Walshe; Mei-Hua Hall; Karl Friston; Robin Murray; Elvira Bramon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  The role of metacognition and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in psychosis: an analogue study.

Authors:  Kristen Hagen; Stian Solem; Håvard Berg Opstad; Bjarne Hansen; Roger Hagen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  The relation between schizotypy and early attention to rejecting interactions: The influence of neuroticism.

Authors:  Preethi Premkumar; Juliana Onwumere; Jacobo Albert; Dominique Kessel; Veena Kumari; Elizabeth Kuipers; Luis Carretié
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Metacognitive beliefs in individuals at risk for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences.

Authors:  Josef Baumgartner; Zsuzsa Litvan; Marlene Koch; Barbara Hinterbuchinger; Fabian Friedrich; Lukas Baumann; Nilufar Mossaheb
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr       Date:  2020-04-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.