Literature DB >> 16816759

Disc distraction shows evidence of regenerative potential in degenerated intervertebral discs as evaluated by protein expression, magnetic resonance imaging, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression analysis.

Thorsten Guehring1, Georg W Omlor, Helga Lorenz, Karl Engelleiter, Wiltrud Richter, Claus Carstens, Markus Kroeber.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An animal model of degeneration was used to determine the effects of disc distraction, and was evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as gene and protein expression levels.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate gene expression and MRI effects of distraction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc degeneration can result from hyper-physiologic loading. Distracted discs with degeneration showed histologic signs of tissue recovery.
METHODS: There were 18 rabbits that underwent 28 days of compression (200 N) to induce moderate disc degeneration followed by 28 days of distraction (120 N; attached and loaded distraction device) or sham distraction (attached but unloaded distraction device). Comparison was performed with 56 days of compressed discs without distraction. Quantitative outcome measures were MRI signal intensity and gene expression analysis to determine: messenger ribonucleic acid levels for extracellular matrix genes, including collagen 1, collagen 2, biglycan, decorin, aggrecan, fibromodulin, and osteonectin; and matrix-regulative genes, including matrix metalloproteinase-13, tissue-inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2. Immunohistology was performed for collagen 2 and BMP-2 to label cells semiquantitatively by staining of the cell-surrounding matrix.
RESULTS: A total of 28 days of compression decreased signal intensity. Distraction over the same period reestablished physiologic signal intensity, however, a persistent reduction was found in sham distraction. Distraction resulted in gene expression up-regulation of collagen 1 (5.4-fold), collagen 2 (5.5-fold), biglycan (7.7-fold), and decorin (3.4-fold), while expression of fibromodulin (0.16-fold), tissue-inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (0.05-fold), and BMP-2 (0.15-fold) was decreased, as compared with 56 days compression. Distracted discs showed more BMP-2 (19.67 vs. 3.67 in 56 days compression) and collagen 2 (18.67 vs. 11.33 in 56 days compression) positive cells per field.
CONCLUSIONS: Distraction results in disc rehydration, stimulated extracellular matrix gene expression, and increased numbers of protein-expressing cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16816759     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000224558.81765.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  Jacques Sénégas; Jean-Marc Vital; Vincent Pointillart; Paolo Mangione
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  A phased rehabilitation protocol for athletes with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Leonard H Vangelder; Barbara J Hoogenboom; Daniel W Vaughn
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

4.  Different Expression of Extracellular Matrix Genes : Primary vs. Recurrent Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Sung-Uk Kuh; Young-Min Kwon; Dong-Kyu Chin; Keun-Su Kim; Byung-Ho Jin; Yong-Eun Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-01-31

5.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Rehydration of a degenerated disc on MRI synchronized with transition of Modic changes following stand-alone XLIF" by K. Kita, T. Sakai, M. Abe, Y. Takata and K. Sairyo (Eur Spine J; 2017: doi:10.1007/s00586-017-4945-6).

Authors:  Rishi M Kanna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Jonathon R Ball; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Nonoperative management of discogenic back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Young Lu; Javier Z Guzman; Devina Purmessur; James C Iatridis; Andrew C Hecht; Sheeraz A Qureshi; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Biomechanical characterization of an annulus-sparing spinal disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  A novel in vivo porcine model of intervertebral disc degeneration induced by cryoinjury.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Nicolas Jullien; Charlie Bouthors; Eric Beohou; Béatrice Laurent; Philippe Bierling; Arnaud Dubory; Hélène Rouard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Innovative application of Cox Flexion Distraction Decompression to the knee: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Luigi Albano
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.