Esther Hing1, Kate M Brett. 1. Division of Health Care Statistics, and Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, USA. EHing@cdc.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2002, the combination estrogen-progestin hormone therapy (HT) treatment arm of the Women's Health Initiative was terminated early because cardiovascular and cancer risks were identified, while the estrogen-only therapy (ET) arm of this trial continued. We investigated hormone therapy prescription practice changes between 2001 and 2003 to explore the effects of the clinical trial results. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the years 2001 through 2003. These nationally representative surveys sample medical encounters in nonfederally employed physician's offices and outpatient departments of nonfederal short-stay and general hospitals. The proportion and rate of visits with ET and HT prescriptions were calculated. Logistic regression was used to estimate change over time accounting for patient and provider characteristics. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2003, the number of visits with menopausal hormone prescriptions fell from 26.5 million to 16.9 million. Almost three-quarters of hormone visits were for ET prescriptions. The decrease in the rate of visits was slightly larger for HT prescription visits (44%) than ET prescription visits (35%). The rate of decline was highest among women 50 years of age and over. After controlling for covariates, there was no significant difference in the decline by hormone type. CONCLUSION: These nationally representative data indicate substantial declines in menopausal hormone prescriptions coinciding with clinical trial results on HT. These declines occurred among all types of therapy and patient characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.
OBJECTIVE: In 2002, the combination estrogen-progestin hormone therapy (HT) treatment arm of the Women's Health Initiative was terminated early because cardiovascular and cancer risks were identified, while the estrogen-only therapy (ET) arm of this trial continued. We investigated hormone therapy prescription practice changes between 2001 and 2003 to explore the effects of the clinical trial results. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the years 2001 through 2003. These nationally representative surveys sample medical encounters in nonfederally employed physician's offices and outpatient departments of nonfederal short-stay and general hospitals. The proportion and rate of visits with ET and HT prescriptions were calculated. Logistic regression was used to estimate change over time accounting for patient and provider characteristics. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2003, the number of visits with menopausal hormone prescriptions fell from 26.5 million to 16.9 million. Almost three-quarters of hormone visits were for ET prescriptions. The decrease in the rate of visits was slightly larger for HT prescription visits (44%) than ET prescription visits (35%). The rate of decline was highest among women 50 years of age and over. After controlling for covariates, there was no significant difference in the decline by hormone type. CONCLUSION: These nationally representative data indicate substantial declines in menopausal hormone prescriptions coinciding with clinical trial results on HT. These declines occurred among all types of therapy and patient characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.
Authors: Susan L Lakey; Susan D Reed; Andrea Z LaCroix; Lou Grothaus; Katherine M Newton Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Sybil L Crawford; Carolyn J Crandall; Carol A Derby; Samar R El Khoudary; L Elaine Waetjen; Mary Fischer; Hadine Joffe Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Pranav Magal; Henry A Spiller; Marcel J Casavant; Thitphalak Chounthirath; Nichole L Hodges; Gary A Smith Journal: J Med Toxicol Date: 2017-09-13
Authors: Celia Byrne; Giske Ursin; Christopher F Martin; Jennifer D Peck; Elodia B Cole; Donglin Zeng; Eunhee Kim; Martin D Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; Gerardo Heiss; Anne McTiernan; Rowan T Chlebowski; Dorothy S Lane; JoAnn E Manson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Etta D Pisano Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Christina M Dieli-Conwright; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Alpa Patel; Michael Press; Kathleen Malone; Giske Ursin; Ronald Burkman; Brian Strom; Michael Simon; Linda Weiss; Polly Marchbanks; Suzanne Folger; Robert Spirtas; Dennis Deapen; Leslie Bernstein Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Leslie Spangler; Susan D Reed; Larissa Nekhyludov; Louis C Grothaus; Andrea Z LaCroix; Katherine M Newton Journal: Menopause Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.953