Literature DB >> 16816038

Can patients be sure they are fully informed when representatives of surgical equipment manufacturers attend their operations?

M Sillender1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the practice in UK hospitals regarding the level of patient involvement and consent when representatives of commercial surgical device manufacturers attend and advise during operations.
METHODS: An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to the senior nurse in charge in all 236 UK gynaecology theatres in 2004. 79/236 (33%) replies were received.
RESULTS: Operating departments were visited every 2 weeks on average by a representative of the surgical device manufacturer. Actual operations were attended every 10 weeks, although there was much variation. 33/79 (42%) units consistently obtained patient consent for visits, usually orally, whereas 40/79 (51%) units did not. 65/79 (82%) units had no guidelines for surgical device representative visits. 91% of nurses in charge believed that there should be guidelines to protect both patients and staff. 6/79 (8%) units were preparing local guidelines at the time of the survey.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, patient safety, confidentiality and autonomy are being protected by a minority of NHS operating theatres when surgical device representatives attend surgery. National guidelines would hopefully ensure that fully informed patient consent is obtained and that representatives are fully trained and supervised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16816038      PMCID: PMC2564485          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.014050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  What have we learnt from the Alder Hey affair? That monitoring physicians' performance is necessary to ensure good practice.

Authors:  H Bauchner; R Vinci
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-10

Review 2.  The ethics of intimate examinations-teaching tomorrow's doctors.

Authors:  Yvette Coldicott; Catherine Pope; Clive Roberts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-11

Review 3.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

4.  Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data.

Authors:  Donald J Willison; Karim Keshavjee; Kalpana Nair; Charlie Goldsmith; Anne M Holbrook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-15
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Low ERCP Volume Is Associated with More Industry Representative Interactions but Similar Training of Nurses.

Authors:  Rajesh N Keswani; Phyllis Malpas; Sheryl E Lynch; Gregory A Coté
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The surgical sales representative: examining a new role in urogynecology.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-11-14

3.  Multiple constraints compromise decision-making about implantable medical devices for individual patients: qualitative interviews with physicians.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Ariel Ducey; Pascale Lehoux; Thomas Turgeon; Jeremy Kolbunik; Sue Ross; Patricia Trbovich; Anthony Easty; Chaim Bell; David R Urbach
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  "We can't get along without each other": Qualitative interviews with physicians about device industry representatives, conflict of interest and patient safety.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Pascale Lehoux; Ariel Ducey; Anthony Easty; Sue Ross; Chaim Bell; Patricia Trbovich; David R Urbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.