Literature DB >> 16814809

The comparison of immobility time in experimental rat swimming models.

Caroline Morini Calil1, Fernanda Klein Marcondes.   

Abstract

Rat swimming models have been used in studies about stress and depression. However, there is no consensus about interpreting immobility (helplessness or adaptation) in the literature. In the present study, immobility time, glucose and glycogen mobilization, corticosterone and the effect of desipramine and diazepam were investigated in two different models: swimming stress and the forced swimming test. Immobility time was lower in swimming stress than in the forced swimming test. Both swimming models increased corticosterone levels in comparison with control animal levels. Moreover, swimming stress induced higher corticosterone levels than the forced swimming test did [F(2,14)=59.52; p<0.001]. Liver glycogen content values differed from one another (swimming stress<forced swimming test<control), [F(2,17)=32.08; p<0.001]. The glycogen content values in the gastrocnemius [F(2,16)=11.35; p=0.026] and soleus [F(2,16)=8.68; p=0.006] muscles were lower during swimming stress in comparison with the forced swimming test and control. The immobility time was recorded and measured in another group treated with desipramine and diazepam in two protocols: a single session of forced swimming test or swimming stress and two sessions (pre- and retest) of forced swimming model or swimming stress. Desipramine decreased the immobility time in the forced swimming test in both the single [F(2,25)=20.63; p<0.0001] and retest [F(2,37)=7.28; p=0.002] swimming session, without changes in the swimming stress model. Diazepam increased the immobility time in the swimming stress but not in the forced swimming test during the single [F(2,26)=11.24; p=0.0003] and retest sessions [F(2,38)=4.17; p=0.02]. It was concluded that swimming stress and the forced swimming test induced different behavior, hormonal and metabolic responses and represented different situations to the animal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16814809     DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci        ISSN: 0024-3205            Impact factor:   5.037


  7 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing behavior in the forced swim test.

Authors:  Olena V Bogdanova; Shami Kanekar; Kristen E D'Anci; Perry F Renshaw
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-05-14

2.  Perindopril ameliorates experimental Alzheimer's disease progression: role of amyloid β degradation, central estrogen receptor and hyperlipidemic-lipid raft signaling.

Authors:  Basim A S Messiha; Mohammed R A Ali; Mahmoud M Khattab; Amira M Abo-Youssef
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.473

3.  Differential behavioral and neurochemical effects of exercise, reboxetine and citalopram with the forced swim test.

Authors:  Teda Arunrut; Hilda Alejandre; Michael Chen; Joseph Cha; Amelia Russo-Neustadt
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 5.037

4.  Prenatal alcohol exposure and chronic mild stress differentially alter depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors in male and female offspring.

Authors:  Kim G C Hellemans; Pamela Verma; Esther Yoon; Wayne K Yu; Allan H Young; Joanne Weinberg
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Bergamot Essential Oil Attenuates Anxiety-Like Behaviour in Rats.

Authors:  Laura Rombolà; Laura Tridico; Damiana Scuteri; Tsukasa Sakurada; Shinobu Sakurada; Hirokazu Mizoguchi; Pinarosa Avato; Maria Tiziana Corasaniti; Giacinto Bagetta; Luigi Antonio Morrone
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  In vivo anti-fatigue activity of sufu with fortification of isoflavones.

Authors:  Yunxian Liu; Yun Zhou; Satoru Nirasawa; Eizo Tatsumi; Yongqiang Cheng; Lite Li
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.085

7.  Effect size, sample size and power of forced swim test assays in mice: Guidelines for investigators to optimize reproducibility.

Authors:  Neil R Smalheiser; Elena E Graetz; Zhou Yu; Jing Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.