Literature DB >> 16814622

Raloxifene enhances vertebral mechanical properties independent of bone density.

Matthew R Allen1, Ken Iwata2, Masahiko Sato3, David B Burr4.   

Abstract

Anti-remodeling agents produce similar reductions in vertebral fracture risk despite large differences in BMD changes suggesting the mechanism of fracture risk reduction may differ among these agents. Forty-eight intact (non-ovariectomized) skeletally mature female beagle dogs were treated orally for 12 months with clinically relevant doses of risedronate (RIS, 0.10 mg/kg/day), alendronate (ALN, 0.2 mg/kg/day), raloxifene (RAL, 0.50 mg/kg/day), or saline (VEH, 1 ml/kg/day). After sacrifice, the following measurements were made on vertebral bone: areal (aBMD) and volumetric (vBMD) bone mineral densities, tissue mineralization by ash content, static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters, microdamage, and extrinsic and intrinsic measures of biomechanical strength, stiffness and energy to fracture. At these doses, RAL suppressed bone turnover (-20%) significantly less than the bisphosphonates (-66 and -71%) and did not produce significant differences in aBMD, vBMD, BV/TV or percent ash compared to VEH-treated animals. Microdamage accumulation in RAL-treated animals was not significantly different than VEH; both RIS and ALN had significantly higher crack surface density compared to VEH. Stiffness was significantly higher than VEH in all treatment groups. Ultimate load divided by aBMD, a measure of strength independent of BMD, was significantly higher only in RAL-treated animals compared to VEH (+16%, P = 0.015). Based on these data, we conclude that raloxifene produces improvements in bone mechanical properties in ways that do not involve increases in BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16814622     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  46 in total

1.  Dynamic bone quality: a noninvasive measure of bone's biomechanical property in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Nelson B Watts; Kermit Davis; Susan Kotowski; Rakesh Shukla; Alok Kumar Dwivedi; Robert Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 2.  Is bone quality associated with collagen age?

Authors:  D J Leeming; K Henriksen; I Byrjalsen; P Qvist; S H Madsen; P Garnero; M A Karsdal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Bone microdamage, remodeling and bone fragility: how much damage is too much damage?

Authors:  Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez; Oran D Kennedy; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-03-18

4.  Changes in vertebral strength-density and energy absorption-density relationships following bisphosphonate treatment in beagle dogs.

Authors:  M R Allen; D B Burr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Variations in nanomechanical properties and tissue composition within trabeculae from an ovine model of osteoporosis and treatment.

Authors:  Jayme C Burket; Daniel J Brooks; Jennifer M MacLeay; Shefford P Baker; Adele L Boskey; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Relative effectiveness of osteoporosis drugs for preventing nonvertebral fracture.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Jeffrey N Katz; M Alan Brookhart; Til Stürmer; Margaret R Stedman; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Bone cell-independent benefits of raloxifene on the skeleton: a novel mechanism for improving bone material properties.

Authors:  Maxime A Gallant; Drew M Brown; Max Hammond; Joseph M Wallace; Jiang Du; Alix C Deymier-Black; Jonathan D Almer; Stuart R Stock; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Density and architecture have greater effects on the toughness of trabecular bone than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Constance L Slaboch; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Effects of suppression of bone turnover on cortical and trabecular load sharing in the canine vertebral body.

Authors:  Senthil K Eswaran; Grant Bevill; Prem Nagarathnam; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.