Literature DB >> 16814619

Studies on chromosome aberration induction: what can they tell us about DNA repair?

Susan M Bailey1, Joel S Bedford.   

Abstract

Many, if not the majority of spontaneous or induced mutations in somatic mammalian cells associated with cancer are large chromosome level changes. For exposure to carcinogenic agents, certain specific chromosomal aberrations are likely to lie early along the pathway leading from initial molecular damage to cancer. The kinds of aberrations that occur, and the positions of breakpoints involved in their formation, can reveal not only genes and controlling elements whose expression or suppression underlie the molecular nature of the initiation of malignant transformation, but also how structural and functional features of chromatin can affect processes involved in repair or mis-repair of initial DNA damage. Thus, cytogenetics can provide information in ways that are not readily appreciated in studies requiring disruption of chromatin organization as it exists in the cell and its tissue context, and where DNA repair assays measure effects averaged over the entire genome. Examples include the fact that in contrast to a more efficient repair of single strand or base damage in transcriptionally active chromatin, after ionizing radiation exposure, the preponderance of translocation breakpoints indicating mis-repair occur in transcriptionally active or potentially active chromatin. Cytogenetic studies have led to the recognition that processing of DNA ends - both ends resulting from breaks along chromosomes and natural chromosomal termini, or telomeres - share very interesting similarities and differences. Further, direct observation of chromatin in cells during interphase can speak directly to early stages of aberration formation where processes occur within the context of intact cells, and to the role (or lack thereof) of cell cycle checkpoint responses that often accompany DNA damage. The superior resolution of many of the current molecular cytogenetics approaches, combined with immunocytochemical detection of proteins involved in DNA damage processing, and the availability of repair deficient mutants or knockdown strategies such as RNA interference, suggest that cytogenetics may still provide useful information and set certain restrictions important for rational interpretation of studies of DNA repair and associated protein interactions that can only be carried out in vitro. The intent of this paper is to focus on contributions of studies on the production of chromosomal aberrations following ionizing radiation exposure regarding important insights on associated DNA repair processes involved, and further, on guidelines or constraints they provide for the interpretation of in vitro DNA repair studies that would have been difficult to appreciate without the cytogenetics. We will first briefly summarize some early studies that serve as a reminder of the background on which current studies are based, and then carry forward to the present day certain interesting facets of these studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16814619     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  9 in total

1.  Rint1 inactivation triggers genomic instability, ER stress and autophagy inhibition in the brain.

Authors:  P Grigaravicius; E Kaminska; C A Hübner; P J McKinnon; A von Deimling; P-O Frappart
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  Nucleosomes suppress the formation of double-strand DNA breaks during attempted base excision repair of clustered oxidative damages.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; Betty P Tsang; Susan S Wallace; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization.

Authors:  S V Costes; I Chiolo; J M Pluth; M H Barcellos-Hoff; B Jakob
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Cytogenetic study of Ascaris trypsin inhibitor in cultured human lymphocytes with metabolic activation.

Authors:  Joanna Blaszkowska; Wanda Bratkowska; Dobroslawa Lopaczynska; Tomasz Ferenc
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Evaluation of Capability and Relationship of Different Radiobiological Endpoints for Radiosensitivity Prediction in Human Tumor Cell Lines Compared with Clonogenic Survival.

Authors:  Fatemeh Pakniyat; Hassan Ali Nedaie; Hossein Mozdarani; Aziz Mahmoudzadeh; Somayeh Gholami
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  Differential Radiosensitizing Effect of 50 nm Gold Nanoparticles in Two Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Pérez-Amor; Leonardo Barrios; Gemma Armengol; Joan Francesc Barquinero
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09

7.  A systems approach defining constraints of the genome architecture on lineage selection and evolvability during somatic cancer evolution.

Authors:  Albert Rübben; Ole Nordhoff
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Role of LET and chromatin structure on chromosomal inversion in CHO10B2 cells.

Authors:  Ian M Cartwright; Matthew D Genet; Akira Fujimori; Takamitsu A Kato
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2014-01-28

Review 9.  Clinical and Functional Assays of Radiosensitivity and Radiation-Induced Second Cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Habash; Luis C Bohorquez; Elizabeth Kyriakou; Tomas Kron; Olga A Martin; Benjamin J Blyth
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.